高级搜索
恩度不同给药途径联合TP方案治疗进展期卵巢癌的临床观察[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2016, 43(1): 54-57. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2016.01.012
引用本文: 恩度不同给药途径联合TP方案治疗进展期卵巢癌的临床观察[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2016, 43(1): 54-57. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2016.01.012
Different Administration Ways of Endostar Combined with TP Regimen on Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2016, 43(1): 54-57. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2016.01.012
Citation: Different Administration Ways of Endostar Combined with TP Regimen on Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2016, 43(1): 54-57. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2016.01.012

恩度不同给药途径联合TP方案治疗进展期卵巢癌的临床观察

Different Administration Ways of Endostar Combined with TP Regimen on Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients

  • 摘要: 目的 观察重组人内皮抑素恩度(endostar)持续静脉泵入和静脉滴注两种方式联合TP方案治疗进展期卵巢癌的疗效和不良反应。方法 32例经病理组织学和(或)细胞学证实的进展期卵巢癌患者,随机分为试验组(恩度持续静脉泵+TP方案联合治疗)和对照组(恩度静脉滴注+TP方案联合治疗),每组各16例,比较治疗前、治疗2周期、4周期后肿瘤大小、血清VEGF水平的变化,评价临床疗效和安全性。 结果 2周期后试验组有效率和疾病控制率分别为37.5%和62.5%,对照组分别为25.0%和62.5%,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。4周期后试验组有效率和疾病控制率分别为50.0%和81.3%,对照组分别为31.3%和75.0%,两组有效率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后试验组血清中VEGF的表达量低于对照组(P<0.05),且4周期后VEGF的表达量显著低于2周期(P<0.01)。试验组心脏不良反应、骨髓抑制发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 恩度持续静脉泵入近期疗效较好,并可有效下调晚期卵巢癌血清中VEGF的表达,且不良反应轻微。

     

    Abstract: Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of intravenous infusion and pump of rh-endostatin injection (Endostar) combined with paclitaxel puls cisplatin (TP) regimen on patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Methods Thirty-two patients with advanced ovarian cancer confirmed by histopathology or cytopathology were randomly divided into trial group (intravenous pumping+TP, n=16) and control group (intravenous infusion+TP, n=16). The serum VEGF levels and tumor size were measured before and after two cycles, and after four cycles of treatment between both groups, to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety. Results After two cycles treatment, the effective rate was 37.5% (6/16) and disease control rate was 62.5% (10/16) in the trail group; while those were 25.0% (4/16) and 62.5% (10/16) in the control group(P>0.05). After four cycles treatment, the effective rate was 50.0% (8/16) and disease control rate was 81.3% (13/16) in the trail group; while those were 31.3% (5/16) and 75.0% (12/16) in the control group(P>0.05). The serum VEGF levels in the trial group were lower than that in the control group (P<0.05), and the VEGF levels after four cycles treatment were significantly lower than that after two cycles treatment (P<0.01). The incidence of cardiovascular toxicity and myelosuppression in the trial group were lower than those in the control group, with significant difference(P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of intravenous pumping of Endostar on patients with advanced ovarian cancer is remarkable; it could reduce the S-VEGF level and has lower adverse reaction than intravenous infusion.

     

/

返回文章
返回