高级搜索

不同治疗方式对卵巢上皮癌患者铂类药物耐药性的影响

黄裕, 李雨聪, 王冬, 周琦

黄裕, 李雨聪, 王冬, 周琦. 不同治疗方式对卵巢上皮癌患者铂类药物耐药性的影响[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2015, 42(11): 1139-1143. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2015.11.018
引用本文: 黄裕, 李雨聪, 王冬, 周琦. 不同治疗方式对卵巢上皮癌患者铂类药物耐药性的影响[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2015, 42(11): 1139-1143. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2015.11.018
Huang Yu, Li Yucong, Wang Dong, Zhou Qi. Platinum Resistance after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Interval Debulking Surgery Compared with Primary Debulking Surgery on Patients with Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2015, 42(11): 1139-1143. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2015.11.018
Citation: Huang Yu, Li Yucong, Wang Dong, Zhou Qi. Platinum Resistance after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Interval Debulking Surgery Compared with Primary Debulking Surgery on Patients with Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2015, 42(11): 1139-1143. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2015.11.018

不同治疗方式对卵巢上皮癌患者铂类药物耐药性的影响

基金项目: 重庆市科委应用开发计划项目(cstc2014yykfA110032)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    黄裕(1977-),女,硕士,副主任医师,主要从事妇科肿瘤的研究

  • 中图分类号: R737.31

Platinum Resistance after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Interval Debulking Surgery Compared with Primary Debulking Surgery on Patients with Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma

  • 摘要: 目的 本研究回顾性分析比较初始肿瘤细胞减灭术(primary debulking surgery, PDS)辅以铂类药物的联合化疗和新辅助化疗后行间隔肿瘤细胞减灭术(neoadjuvant chemotherapy-intervaldebulking surgery, NACT-IDS)两种治疗方式对卵巢上皮癌患者铂类药物耐药性的影响。 方法 选择2007年1月至2013年12月符合研究要求的上皮性卵巢,输卵管和腹膜癌Ⅲ、Ⅳ期患者共87例,分为PDS(n=56)组和NACT-IDS(n=31)组,比较两组对铂类药物的敏感度,单因素及多因素Logistic回归分析各项基线资料与铂类药物耐药性的关系。 结果 以铂类药物为基础的初次治疗后,NACT-IDS组4例(7.1%)为铂耐药,PDS组也有4例(12.7%),耐药率比较两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。采用多因素Logistic回归控制分析独立相关因素,NACT-IDS将增加产生铂类药物耐药的风险。手术残余病灶大小和临床分期仍是影响复发时间和铂耐药率的显著相关因素。 结论 晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者采取NACT-IDS治疗方式,与PDS治疗方式相比,有效化疗反应率相当,但更易出现铂类药物耐药。

     

    Abstract: Objective To retrospectively analyze the prognostic factors of platinum resistance in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery(NACT-IDS) or primary debulking surgery(PDS). Methods We divided 87 patients with stages Ⅲ and Ⅳ epithelial ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma who underwent treatment from January, 2007 to December, 2013 into PDS(n=56) group and(n=31) NACT-IDS group, to compare the sensitivity to platinum drugs. Standard univariate analysis was performed, as was multivariable analysis with logistic regression, to analyze the relationship between baseline data and platinum resistance. Results After the initial platinum-based chemotherapy, 4(7.1%) cases in the NACT-IDS group were considered as platinum resistant disease, compared with 4(12.7%) in the PDS group(P<0.05). When univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to control the factors independently associated with platinum resistance, NACT-IDS was significantly associated with an initial increased risk of platinum resistance. Residual lesion size and clinical staging were still the significant factors for the recurrence time and platinum resistance. Conclusion For advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy,NACT-IDS has the similar chemotherapy efficiency to PDS, but increases the risk of platinum resistance.

     

  • [1] Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2013, 63(1): 11-30.
    [2] van Meurs HS, Tajik P, Hof MH, et al. Which patients benefit most from primary surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage ⅢC or Ⅳ ovarian cancer? An exploratory analysis of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 55971 randomised trial[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2013, 49(15): 3191-201.
    [3] Chang SJ, Bristow RE, Ryu HS. Impact of complete cytoreduction leaving no gross residual disease associated with radical cytoreductive surgical procedures on survival in advanced ovarian cancer[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012, 19(13): 4059-67.
    [4] Chang SJ, Bristow RE. Evolution of surgical treatment paradigms for advanced stage ovarian cancer: redefining 'optimal' residual disease[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2012, 125(2): 483-92.
    [5] Rauh-Hain JA, Nitschmann CC, Worley MJ Jr, et al. Platinum resistance after neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to primary surgery in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2013, 129(1): 63-8.
    [6] Dewdney SB, Rimel BJ, Reinhart AJ, et al. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer: survey results from members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2010, 119(1): 18-21.
    [7] Keyver-Paik MD, Zivanovic O, Rudlowski C, et al. Interval debulking surgery in patients with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics(FIGO) stage ⅢC and Ⅳovarian cancer[J]. Onkologie, 20 13, 36(6): 324-32.
    [8] Vergote I, Tropé CG, Amant F, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage ⅢC or Ⅳovarian cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2010, 363(10): 943-53.
    [9] Rauh-Hain JA, Rodriguez N, Growdon WB, et al. Primary debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage Ⅳ ovarian cancer[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012, 19(3): 959-65.
    [10] Chi DS, Musa F, Dao F, et al. An analysis of patients with bulky advanced stage ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma treated with primary debulking surgery (PDS) during an identical time period as the randomized EORTC-NCIC trial of PDS vs. neoadjuvant chemotherapy( NACT)[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2012, 12 4(1): 10-4.
    [11] Le T, Faught W, Hopkins L, et al. Can surgical debulking reverse platinum resistance in patients with metastatic epithelial ovarian cancer?[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2009, 31(1): 42-7.
    [12] Milam MR, Tao X, Coleman RL, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with prolonged primary treatment intervals in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2011, 21(1): 66-71.
    [13] Fagö-Olsen CL, Ottesen B, Kehlet H, et al. Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy impair long-term survival for ovarian cancer patients? A nationwide Danish study[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2014, 13 2(2): 292-8.
    [14] Muraji M, Sudo T, Iwasak, et al. Histopathology predicts clinical outcome in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and debulking surger[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2013, 131(3): 531-4.
    [15] Kehoe S, Hook J, Nankivell M, et al. Chemotherapy or upfront surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: results from the MRC-CHORUS trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2013, 31(Suppl): abstr 5500.
    [16] Sato S, Itamochi H. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: latest results and place in therapy[J]. Ther Adv Med Oncol, 2014, 6(6): 293-304.
    [17] Rauh-Hain JA, Rodriguez N, Growdon WB, et al. Primary debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage Ⅳ ovarian cancer[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012, 19(3): 959-65.
    [18] Luyckx M, Leblanc E, Filleron T, et al. Maximal cytoreduction in patients with FIGO stage ⅢC to stage Ⅳovarian, fallopian, and peritoneal cancer in day-to-day practice: a retrospective french multicentric study[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2012, 22(8): 1337-43.
    [19] Fagö-Olsen CL, Håkansson F, Antonsen SL, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of risk of malignancy index in predicting complete tumor removal at primary debulking surgery for ovarian cancer patients[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2013, 92(6): 721-6.
    [20] Hynninen J, Lavonius M, Oksa S, et al. Is perioperative visual estimation of intra-abdominal tumor spread reliable in ovarian cancer surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy?[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2013, 128(2): 229-32.
    [21] Bristow RE, Eisenhauer EL, Santillan A, et al. Delaying the primary surgical effort for advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreduction[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2007, 104 (2): 480-90.
    [22] Vanessa CM, Ângelo BS, Carlos HA, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with six cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced ovarian cancer patients unsuitable for primary surgery: safety and effectiveness[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2014, 132(2): 287-91.
    [23] Xiao X, Melton DW, Gourley C. Mismatch repair deficiency in ovarian cancer-molecular characteristics and clinical implications[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2014, 132(2): 506-12.
    [24] Zhang GN, Liu H, Huang JM, et al.TP53 K351N mutationassociated platinum resistance after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2014, 13 2(3): 752-7.
    [25] Matsuo K, Eno ML, Im DD, et al. Chemotherapy time interval and development of platinum and taxane resistance in ovarian, fallopian, and peritoneal carcinomas[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 20 10, 281(2): 325-8.
    [26] Segev Y, Gemer O, Auslender R, et al. Advanced ovarian cancer: primary debulking(PDS) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NACT)- still a debate[J]. Harefuah, 2014, 153(9): 527-31, 558.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1207
  • HTML全文浏览量:  328
  • PDF下载量:  1030
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-12-30
  • 修回日期:  2015-04-06
  • 刊出日期:  2015-11-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    x 关闭 永久关闭