高级搜索

胸中下段食管鳞癌隆突下淋巴结转移CT扫描特征与病理的一致性

胡瑞, 柳恩跃, 张国庆, 斯坎达尔·阿不力孜, 庞作良, 孙伟

胡瑞, 柳恩跃, 张国庆, 斯坎达尔·阿不力孜, 庞作良, 孙伟. 胸中下段食管鳞癌隆突下淋巴结转移CT扫描特征与病理的一致性[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2015, 42(08): 806-809. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2015.08.012
引用本文: 胡瑞, 柳恩跃, 张国庆, 斯坎达尔·阿不力孜, 庞作良, 孙伟. 胸中下段食管鳞癌隆突下淋巴结转移CT扫描特征与病理的一致性[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2015, 42(08): 806-809. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2015.08.012
HU Rui, LIU Enyue, ZHANG Guoqing, Sikandaer·Abulizi, PANG Zuoliang, SUN Wei. Consistency of Pathological and CT Scanning Characteristics of Subcarinal Lymph Node Metastasis from Middle and Lower Segment of Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2015, 42(08): 806-809. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2015.08.012
Citation: HU Rui, LIU Enyue, ZHANG Guoqing, Sikandaer·Abulizi, PANG Zuoliang, SUN Wei. Consistency of Pathological and CT Scanning Characteristics of Subcarinal Lymph Node Metastasis from Middle and Lower Segment of Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2015, 42(08): 806-809. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2015.08.012

胸中下段食管鳞癌隆突下淋巴结转移CT扫描特征与病理的一致性

详细信息
    作者简介:

    胡瑞(1986-),男,硕士,医师,主要从事胸部肿瘤的基础研究与综合诊治

    通讯作者:

    孙伟,E-mail:sunw69@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R735.1

Consistency of Pathological and CT Scanning Characteristics of Subcarinal Lymph Node Metastasis from Middle and Lower Segment of Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma

  • 摘要: 目的 分析胸中下段食管鳞癌隆突下淋巴结转移与CT影像学特征之间的相关性,为CT诊断提供依据。方法 选取2012—2014年间手术切除的174例胸中下段食管鳞癌患者,分析隆突下淋巴结转移与影像学CT扫描淋巴结特点的关系。结果 全组共清扫4 862枚淋巴结,平均每例清扫淋巴结(27.94±11.6)枚,转移淋巴结306枚,转移率57.47%(100/174),转移度为6.29%(306/4862)。其中,隆突下淋巴结转移率为17.24%(30/174),转移度为6.57%(44/670)。隆突下淋巴结转移与CT扫描淋巴结的短长径之比及淋巴结短径具有相关性(rs=-0.448, P<0.001; rs=0.378, P=0.002)。隆突下淋巴结转移的CT诊断与术后病理具有一致性(Kappa=0.628, P<0.001),一致率为89.66%,特异性为94.44%,敏感度为66.67%,误诊率为5.56%,漏诊率为33.33%,阳性预测值为71.43%,阴性预测值为93.15%。结论 (1)胸中下段食管鳞癌隆突下淋巴结转移与CT中淋巴结的短长径之比及淋巴结短径具有相关性;(2)术前CT扫描隆突下淋巴结转移与术后病理具有一致性。

     

    Abstract: Objective To analyze the relationship between the subcarinal lymph node metastasis from middle and lower segment of thoracic esophageal squamous carcinoma and the CT imaging characteristics, to provide certain basis for CT diagnosis. Methods We selected 174 esophageal cancer patients who received operation from 2012 to 2014, and analyzed the relationship between the status and the characteristics of lymph nodes on CT imaging examination. Results There were 4862 lymph nodes cleaned. The average of lymph nodes was (27.94±11.6)/case. Lymph node metastasis number was 306, and transfer rate was 57.47% (100/174), and transfer degree was 6.29%(306/4862). Among them, subcarinal lymph node metastasis rate was 17.24% (30/174) and transfer degree was 6.57% (44/670). The ratio of short-length diameter was related with the shortest diameter in CT(rs=-0.448, P=0.009; rs=0.378, P=0.028). It has consistency between CT diagnosis and postoperatively pathological diagnosis of subcarinal lymph node metastasis (Kappa=0.628, P<0.001). The concordance rate was 89.66%, the specificity was 94.44%, the sensitivity was only 66.67%, the misdiagnosis rate was 5.56%, the rate of missed diagnosis was 33.33%, positive predictive value was 71.43%, and negative predictive value was 93.15%. Conclusion (1)It has relationship between subcarinal lymph node metastasis and the ratio of short-length diameter and the shortest diameter in CT. (2)It has consistency between CT diagnosis and postoperatively pathological diagnosis of subcarinal lymph node metastasis.

     

  • [1] Hu R, Wu XY, Sun W. Review on lymphadenectomy and lymph node dissection number for esophageal carcinoma[J]. Zhong Liu Fang Zhi Yan Jiu, 2014, 41(5): 488-91. [胡瑞, 吴晓燕, 孙伟. 食 管癌淋巴结清扫数目及术式的研究进展[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 20 14, 41(5): 488-91.]
    [2] Guo W, Ma Z, Zhao YP, et al, Controllable metastasis:the trap for esophageal cancer cells?[J]. Med Hypotheses, 2010, 74(6): 10 00-1.
    [3] Huang SY, Luo JG, Wang YB. Value of spiral computed tomography in preoperative staging assessment of esophageal cancer[J]. Zhongguo Xian Dai Yi Yao Za Zhi, 2009, 11(7): 122-3. [黄少宇, 罗建光, 王远波. 螺旋CT扫描在食管癌术前分期评估 中的价值[J]. 中国现代医药杂志, 2009, 11(7): 122-3.]
    [4] Wang JY, Dong D, Dai CL, et al. Value of multi slice spiral computed tomography in diagnosing lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer[J]. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao, 2010, 32 (6): 659-62. [王景宇, 冬冬, 戴春来, 等. 多层螺旋CT对胃癌 淋巴结转移的诊断价值[J]. 中国医学科学院学报, 2010, 32(6): 65 9-62.]
    [5] Fukuya T, Honda H, Hayashi T, et al. Lymph-node metastases: efficacy for detection with helical CT in patients with gastric cancer[J]. Radiology, 1995, 197(3): 705-11.
    [6] Wang J, Qi LP, Li XT, et al. CT evaluation on mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with peripheral non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ying Xiang Ji Shu, 2012, 28(10): 1839-43. [王娟, 齐丽萍, 李晓婷, 等. 探讨周围型非小细胞肺癌纵隔淋 巴结转移相关CT表现[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2012, 28(10): 18 39-43.]
    [7] Torabi M, Aquino SL, Harisinghani MG. Current concepts in lymph node imaging [J]. J Nucl Med, 2004, 45(9): 1509-18.
    [8] Choi J, Kim SG, Kim JS, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ulteasonography(EUS), positron emission tomography(PET), and computed tomography(CT)in the preoperative locoregional staging of resectable esophageal cancer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24 (6): 1380-6.
    [9] Zhu SC, Song CL, Liu ZK, et al. Analysis of the rule of lymph node metastasis and evaluation of the consistence of preoperative computed tomographic findings and postoperative pathologic diagnosis for thoracic esophageal carcinoma[J]. Zhonghua Fang She Zhong Liu Xue Za Zhi, 2011, 20(1): 28-31. [祝淑钗, 宋长亮, 刘志坤, 等. 食管癌淋巴结转移术前CT扫描与术后病理诊断一 致性研究[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2011, 20(1): 28-31.]
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1591
  • HTML全文浏览量:  322
  • PDF下载量:  14796
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-07-21
  • 修回日期:  2015-01-08
  • 刊出日期:  2015-08-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    x 关闭 永久关闭