Advanced Search
ZHAO Xin, CAI Xiao-hong, YU Ping, PU Xiao-yan, LU Qun. Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin or Cisplatin in Treatment with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2007, 34(10): 787-789. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2228
Citation: ZHAO Xin, CAI Xiao-hong, YU Ping, PU Xiao-yan, LU Qun. Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin or Cisplatin in Treatment with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2007, 34(10): 787-789. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2228

Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin or Cisplatin in Treatment with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

  • Objective  To observe the effect and toxicity of gemcitabine plus carboplatin ( GC) and gemcitabine plus cisplatin ( GP) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) . Methods  One hundred and fifty seven patients with histological confirmed NSCLC were enrolled in the study randomly.Twenty-one day for a cycle. Each case was evaluated af ter two cycles. Results  Sixty patients to GC and 50 patient s to GP the objective response rate (CR + PR) was 53. 3 % vs. 55. 8 % in the GC and GP as first-line treatment . Fwenty-one patient s to GC and 24 patients to GP the objective response rate (CR +PR) was 26. 3 % vs 29. 6 % in the GC and GP as second2line t reatment . The median time to progression was 6. 4 months vs 7. 0 months in the GC and GP as first-line treatment and was 4. 8 months vs 5. 1 months in the GC and GP as second-line treatment arm respectively. The median survival time was 8. 9 moths vs 9. 3 moths and 12year survival was 29. 3 % vs. 32. 7 % in the GC and GP group respectively. No significant difference between arms was observed. The clinical benefit rate was 80. 3 % vs 64. 5 % in the GC and GP arm respectively. There was significantly difference between arms ( P < 0. 05) . There was no difference between the arms with hematological toxicity. GP group had a remarkably higher incidence of grade 3~4 nausea/ vomiting than GC group ( P < 0. 005) . Conclusion  GC and GP group provided high effectiveness and safe. However, GC group provided a better overall tolerability and better clinical benefit with GP arm.
  • loading

Catalog

    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return