Advanced Search
MIAO Wenyan, LIN Siying, XU Jianli, WANG Hongbo, JIANG Ming. Effects of Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation from Haploidentical Versus Matched Sibling Donors on High-risk and Refractory/Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2023, 50(10): 988-993. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2023.23.0282
Citation: MIAO Wenyan, LIN Siying, XU Jianli, WANG Hongbo, JIANG Ming. Effects of Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation from Haploidentical Versus Matched Sibling Donors on High-risk and Refractory/Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2023, 50(10): 988-993. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2023.23.0282

Effects of Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation from Haploidentical Versus Matched Sibling Donors on High-risk and Refractory/Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

  • Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from haploidentical and matched sibling donors for treatment of high-risk and refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
    Methods Data on the efficacy of haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (Haplo-HSCT) with myeloablative conditioning regimen were retrospectively analyzed and compared with that of matched sibling donors' peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (MSD-HSCT) for treatment of high-risk refractory/relapsed AML in our center from January 1st, 2010 to June 30th, 2020.
    Results A total of 98 patients were enrolled, including 62 patients in the Haplo-HSCT group and 36 patients in MSD-HSCT group. The median age, conditioning regimen, and infusion doses of MNC and CD34+ cells were significantly different between the two groups, but no significant differences in other baseline parameters were found. Transplantation-related infectious complications and the incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were also not significantly different between the two groups. The 3-year cumulative relapse in the Haplo-HSCT group was significantly lower than that in the MSD-HSCT group (16.2% vs. 41.1%, P=0.036). The 3-year DFS of the Haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT groups were 66.98% and 41.8%, respectively (P=0.140), and their OS were 73.37% and 51.41%, respectively (P=0.105).
    Conclusion The clinical efficacy of Haplo-HSCT for the treatment of high-risk and refractory/relapsed AML is similar to that of MSD-HSCT, and Haplo-HSCT may have better GVL effect.
  • loading

Catalog

    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return