Advanced Search
LV Minhao, QIN Li, LI Juntao, GUO Xuhui, LIU Fawen, CUI Shude, ZHANG Hengwei. 原发性乳腺癌分子分型与新辅助化疗疗效及预后的相关性[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2015, 42(08): 782-788. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2015.08.007
Citation: LV Minhao, QIN Li, LI Juntao, GUO Xuhui, LIU Fawen, CUI Shude, ZHANG Hengwei. 原发性乳腺癌分子分型与新辅助化疗疗效及预后的相关性[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2015, 42(08): 782-788. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2015.08.007

原发性乳腺癌分子分型与新辅助化疗疗效及预后的相关性

More Information
  • Received Date: September 08, 2014
  • Revised Date: October 13, 2014
  • Objective To explore the relationship of molecular subtypes with the responses and outcome of primary breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods We included 204 patients with primary breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in He'nan Tumor Hospital in this retrospective study. The patients were classified into 4 subtypes: Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2 positive and triple-negative. The predictive role of molecular subtype in the response and outcome of breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were analyzed. Results Among all 204 patients, 40(19.6%) patients were Luminal A subtype, 46(22.5%) were Luminal B subtype, 36 (17.6%) were HER2 positive subtype and 82 (40.2%) were triple-negative subtype. The pCR rates of HER2 positive(22.2%) and triplenegative(24.4%) subtypes were higher than those of Luminal A(2.5%) and Luminal B(6.5%), with significant difference(P=0.03). Despite initial chemosensitivity, the patients with HER2 positive and triple-negative subtypes had worse disease-free survival(DFS)(P=0.001) and overall survival(OS)(P= 0.002) than those with Luminal subtypes in the whole population, and especially worse in patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with decreased DFS(P<0.001) and OS(P<0.001). The 5-year DFS and OS of patients who achieved pathological complete response(pCR) were significantly higher than those of patients with residual disease after chemotherapy(P=0.002, P=0.012, respectively). Conclusion We have found that breast cancer patients with HER2 positive and triple-negative subtypes have higher sensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and with higher rates of pCR but worse prognosis than those with Luminal subtypes.
  • [1]
    Miller E, Lee HJ, Lulla A, et al. Current treatment of early breast cancer: adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy[J]. F1000Res, 2014, 3: 198.
    [2]
    Angelucci D, Tinari N, Grassadonia A, et al. Long-term outcome of neoadjuvant systemic therapy for locally advanced breast cancer in routine clinical practice[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 20 13, 139(2): 269-80.
    [3]
    Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26(5): 778-85.
    [4]
    van der Hage JA, van de Velde CJ, Julien JP, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer: results from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 10 902[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2001, 19(22): 4224-37.
    [5]
    Kim SI, Sohn J, Koo JS, et al. Molecular subtypes and tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer[J]. Oncology, 2010, 79(5-6): 324-30.
    [6]
    Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study[J]. JAMA, 2006, 295(21): 2492-502.
    [7]
    Hugh J, Hanson J, Cheang MC, et al. Breast cancer subtypes and response to docetaxel in node-positive breast cancer: use of animmunohistochemical definition in the BCIRG 001 trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27(8): 1168-76.
    [8]
    Ortiz AP, Frías O, Pérez J, et al. Breast cancer molecular subtypes and survival in a hospital-based sample in Puerto Rico [J]. Cancer Med, 2013, 2(3): 343-50.
    [9]
    Cheang MC, Voduc D, Bajdik C, et al. Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value than triple-negative phenotype[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2008, 14 (5):1368-76.
    [10]
    Livasy CA, Karaca G, Nanda R, et al. Phenotypic evaluation of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma[J]. Mod Pathol, 20 06, 19(2): 264-71.
    [11]
    Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, et al. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2007, 13(8): 2329-34.
    [12]
    James K, Eisenhauer E, Christian M, et al. Measuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1999, 91(6): 523-8.
    [13]
    Huober J, von Minckwitz G, Denkert C, et al. Effect of neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy in different biological breast cancer phenotypes: overall results from the GeparTrio study[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2010, 124(1): 133-40.
    [14]
    Bhargava R, Beriwal S, Dabbs DJ, et al. Immunohistochemical surrogate markers of breast cancer molecular classes predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A single institutional experience with 359 cases[J]. Cancer, 2010, 116(6): 1431-9.
    [15]
    Straver ME, Rutgers EJ, Rodenhuis S, et al. The relevance of breast cancer subtypes in the outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2010, 17(9):2411-8.
    [16]
    Parker JS, Mullins M, Cheang MC, et al. Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes[J]. J Clin Oncol, 20 09, 27(8): 1160-7.
    [17]
    Rodenhuis S, Mandjes IA, Wesseling J, et al. A simple system for grading the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Ann Oncol, 2010, 21(3): 481-7.
    [18]
    Goldhirsch A , Wood WC, Coates AS, et al. Strategies for subtypes—dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011[J]. Ann Oncol, 2011, 22(8): 17 36-1747.
    [19]
    Straver ME, Rutgers EJ, Rodenhuis S, et al. The Relevance of breast Cancer subtypes in the outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2010, 17(9): 2411-8.
    [20]
    Kümler I , Tuxen MK, Nielsen DL. A systematic review of dual targeting in HER2-positive breast cancer[J]. Cancer Treat Rev, 20 14, 40(2): 259-70.
    [21]
    Prat A, Cruz C, Hoadley KA, et al. Molecular features of the basallike breast cancer subtype based on BRCA1 mutation status[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2014, 147(1): 185-91.
    [22]
    Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C, et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25(28): 4414-22.
  • Related Articles

    [1]HE Yang, YANG Runfeng, ZHOU Yingying, XU Qian, YAN Hao, JIANG Lei, JIANG Xiaohui, HUANG Yi. Effect of Aprepitant on Chemotherapy-induced Adverse Reactions in Gynecological Malignancy Patients[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2018, 45(11): 913-916. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2018.18.0265
    [2]LI Daojun, XU Xinhua, ZHANG Jianyu, LI Cong. Clinical Observation of Olanzapine in Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting Caused by Opioid Analgesics[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2018, 45(5): 326-328. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2018.17.1275
    [3]DONG Shuang, WANG Jun, HU Sheng, LIAO Guoxiang, RAN Fengming. Aprepitant versus Olanzapine for Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting Induced by Multi-day Chemotherapy in Female Lung Cancer or Breast Cancer Patients[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2017, 44(5): 356-359. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2017.05.009
    [4]LI Quanfu, Jin gaowa, WANG Wenjuan, JIANG Caihong, DENG Shuqin, LI Hui, CHEN Feng, BAI Xiaojun, CHEN Gang, HU Yuliang, ZHAO Jun, Dalenggaowa, Wuyungaowa. Clinical Observation of Neurokinin-1 Antagonist Preventing Multiple-day Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2017, 44(4): 290-294. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2017.04.011
    [5]LV Minhao, QIN Li, LI Juntao, GUO Xuhui, LIU Fawen, CUI Shude, ZHANG Hengwei. 原发性乳腺癌分子分型与新辅助化疗疗效及预后的相关性[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2015, 42(08): 782-788. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2015.08.007
    [6]DONG Shuang, YU Shiying. A Study of Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting Involving Different Dosage Regimens of Cisplatin[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2013, 40(09): 890-893. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2013.09.016
    [7]Xu Lu, Li Chunlai, Li Ling. A Constructive Experimental Study on Prevention of Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting by Ginger-partitioned Moxibustion on Acupoint of Zusanli[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2012, 39(06): 710-712. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2012.06.024
    [8]XU Shu, LI Hong, SONG Yu-hong, LI Bin, CAI Hong-bing. Clinical Comparative of Tropisetron Hydrochloride with or without Traditional Chinese Medicine Compound in Prevention of Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Emesis[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2009, 36(09): 787-790. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2009.09.021
    [9]MA Lei, MA Hai-long, ZHAO Xu-lin, et al. A Clinical Observation of Tropisetron in Combination with Dexame thasone and Methclopramide in the prevention of High Dose Cisplatin- induced Delayed Nausea and Emesis[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2001, 28(06): 469-470. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.474
    [10]Chen Zhendong, . Medroxyprogesterone Acetate with Antiemetics: Efficacy in ControllingAnorexia, Nausea and Vomiting Induced by Chemotherapy[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 1996, 23(2): 102-103.

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return