高级搜索
刘龙娇, 姚宇锋. G蛋白偶联雌激素受体对乳腺癌患者预后和临床病理的影响:系统荟萃分析[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2023, 50(9): 879-886. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2023.23.0237
引用本文: 刘龙娇, 姚宇锋. G蛋白偶联雌激素受体对乳腺癌患者预后和临床病理的影响:系统荟萃分析[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2023, 50(9): 879-886. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2023.23.0237
LIU Longjiao, YAO Yufeng. Effect of G-protein-coupled Estrogen Receptor on Prognosis and Clinicopathological Characteristics of Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Meta-analysis[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2023, 50(9): 879-886. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2023.23.0237
Citation: LIU Longjiao, YAO Yufeng. Effect of G-protein-coupled Estrogen Receptor on Prognosis and Clinicopathological Characteristics of Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Meta-analysis[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2023, 50(9): 879-886. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2023.23.0237

G蛋白偶联雌激素受体对乳腺癌患者预后和临床病理的影响:系统荟萃分析

Effect of G-protein-coupled Estrogen Receptor on Prognosis and Clinicopathological Characteristics of Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Meta-analysis

  • 摘要:
    目的 本研究对G蛋白偶联雌激素受体(GPER)在乳腺癌中的表达及其对预后的作用进行荟萃分析,以了解GPER表达对乳腺癌患者生存和临床病理特征的影响。
    方法 使用相同的搜索策略在2022年11月24日更新的电子数据库中搜索相关文献。提取个体风险比(HR)和优势比(OR)及其95%CI并合并,使用Review Manager 5.4.1评估GPER阳性表达与乳腺癌患者生存结果和临床病理特征之间的关联强度,同时进行异质性和敏感性分析。Begg's检验、Egger's检验和漏斗图用于评估发表偏差。
    结果 GPER表达对乳腺癌患者OS有有利影响(HR=0.77, 95%CI: 0.49-1.22, Z=01.10, P=0.27),对DFS/RFS/DDFS有不利影响(HR=1.03, 95%CI: 0.64-1.65, Z=00.13, P=0.90),但差异均无统计学意义。GPER表达与乳腺癌患者的预后无显著相关性,GPER表达不是BC患者的独立预后因素。此外,GPER的表达与TNM分期(OR=0.31, 95%CI: 0.06-0.55, Z=02.43, P=0.02)、远处转移(OR=6.82, 95%CI: 1.89-24.55, Z=02.94, P=0.003)、组织学分级(OR=0.009, 95%CI: -0.16-0.01, Z=02.16, P=0.03)、ER表达(OR=1.77, 95%CI: 1.15-2.72, Z=02.59, P=0.009)和PR表达(OR=1.36, 95%CI: 1.00-1.84, Z=01.95, P=0.005)有关。
    结论 GPER可能不是乳腺癌的独立预后因素。此外,GPER表达与乳腺癌患者的TNM分期、远处转移、组织学分级、ER表达和PR表达显著相关。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective In this study, a meta-analysis of the expression of G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) in breast cancer (BC) and its role in prognosis was conducted to understand the effect of this expression on the survival and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with BC.
    Methods Identical search strategies were used to search relevant literature in electronic databases updated to November 24, 2022. Individual hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with their 95%CI were extracted and pooled to evaluate the strength of the association between positive GPER expression and survival results, the clinicopathological features of patients with BC. Begg's tests, Egger's tests, and funnel plots were used to evaluate publication bias. Heterogeneity and sensitivity were also assessed. All works were completed using Review Manager 5.4.1.
    Results GPER expression had a favorable effect on OS (HR=0.77; 95%CI: 0.49-1.22; Z=01.10; P=0.27) and an unfavorable effect on DFS/RFS/DDFS (HR=1.03; 95%CI: 0.64-1.65; Z=00.13; P=0.90) in patients with BC. GPER expression was not significantly related to the prognosis of patients with BC, and GPER expression was not an independent prognostic factor. Furthermore, GPER expression was significantly associated with TNM staging (OR=0.31, 95%CI: 0.06-0.55, Z=02.43, P=0.02), distant metastasis (OR=6.82, 95%CI: 1.89-24.55, Z=02.94, P=0.003), histological grade (OR=0.009, 95%CI: −0.16-0.01, Z=02.16, P=0.03), ER expression (OR=1.77, 95%CI: 1.15-2.72, Z=02.59, P=0.009), and PR expression (OR=1.36, 95%CI: 1.00-1.84, Z=01.95, P=0.05).
    Conclusion GPER may not be an independent prognostic factor for BC. GPER expression was significantly related to some clinicopathological features of patients with BC, including TNM staging, distant metastasis, histological grade, ER expression, and PR expression.

     

/

返回文章
返回