高级搜索
王梦圆, 许恒敏, 汪靖暄, 潘凯枫, 李文庆. 孟德尔随机化方法在胃癌危险因素研究中的应用[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2023, 50(5): 470-476. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2023.22.1411
引用本文: 王梦圆, 许恒敏, 汪靖暄, 潘凯枫, 李文庆. 孟德尔随机化方法在胃癌危险因素研究中的应用[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2023, 50(5): 470-476. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2023.22.1411
WANG Mengyuan, XU Hengmin, WANG Jingxuan, PAN Kaifeng, LI Wenqing. Mendelian Randomization Analysis of Research on Risk Factors for Gastric Cancer[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2023, 50(5): 470-476. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2023.22.1411
Citation: WANG Mengyuan, XU Hengmin, WANG Jingxuan, PAN Kaifeng, LI Wenqing. Mendelian Randomization Analysis of Research on Risk Factors for Gastric Cancer[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2023, 50(5): 470-476. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2023.22.1411

孟德尔随机化方法在胃癌危险因素研究中的应用

Mendelian Randomization Analysis of Research on Risk Factors for Gastric Cancer

  • 摘要:
    目的 了解胃癌危险因素研究中孟德尔随机化(MR)方法的应用情况,为胃癌的病因学研究和预防策略制定提供依据。
    方法 在PubMed、Web of Science、EMBASE、中国知网和万方数据检索建库至2022年11月19日收录的基于MR方法的胃癌危险因素研究。由两位作者独立筛选文献、摘录信息并进行质量评价。
    结果 共纳入2016—2022年发表的30篇研究报告,其中20篇被判定为高质量研究。这些研究探讨了行为及生活方式、人体测量特征、机体生物暴露指标及其他疾病罹患情况与胃癌的关系,支持吸烟等因素可能与胃癌发生风险存在因果关联。
    结论 既往MR研究广泛探讨了机体内外暴露因素或表型与胃癌发生的因果关联,为胃癌病因学研究提供了积极证据。但MR研究可能受方法学缺陷制约,需结合其他证据,对结果谨慎解读。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To understand the application and research progress of Mendelian randomization (MR) studies related to gastric cancer and provide a scientific basis for gastric cancer prevention.
    Methods Published studies on risk factors of gastric cancer based on MR methods were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CNKI, and WANFANG DATA from the establishment of each database to November 19th, 2022. Two researchers examined the eligibility of studies, extracted key information, and assessed the research quality independently.
    Results A total of 30 publications published from 2016 to 2022 were included in the study, and 20 were judged to be of high quality. These studies examined the relationship between behaviors and lifestyle factors, anthropometric characteristics, indicators of biological exposure, and other pathological conditions and gastric cancer, and the results suggest potential causal associations between smoking and other factors and the risk of gastric cancer.
    Conclusion Previous MR studies extensively investigated the causal association between internal and external exposures or traits and gastric cancer and provided positive evidence of gastric cancer etiology. However, MR studies may be subject to methodological limitations. Interpretation of results needs to be approached with caution, which necessitates the integration with biological plausibility and evidence from observation studies.

     

/

返回文章
返回