高级搜索
朱晋峰, KumarSaurabha, NancyKablay, 庞红霞. 人类免疫缺陷病毒阳性和阴性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤的临床特点及近期疗效分析[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2016, 43(5): 387-391. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2016.05.014
引用本文: 朱晋峰, KumarSaurabha, NancyKablay, 庞红霞. 人类免疫缺陷病毒阳性和阴性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤的临床特点及近期疗效分析[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2016, 43(5): 387-391. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2016.05.014
ZHU Jinfeng, Kumar Saurabha, Nancy Kablay, PANG Hongxia. Differences of Clinical Features and Short-term Efficacy Between Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphomas of HIV-infected and Non-HIV-infected Patients[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2016, 43(5): 387-391. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2016.05.014
Citation: ZHU Jinfeng, Kumar Saurabha, Nancy Kablay, PANG Hongxia. Differences of Clinical Features and Short-term Efficacy Between Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphomas of HIV-infected and Non-HIV-infected Patients[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2016, 43(5): 387-391. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2016.05.014

人类免疫缺陷病毒阳性和阴性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤的临床特点及近期疗效分析

Differences of Clinical Features and Short-term Efficacy Between Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphomas of HIV-infected and Non-HIV-infected Patients

  • 摘要:
    目的  分析比较人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)阳性与阴性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的临床特点及疗效。
    方法  收集博茨瓦纳弗朗西斯敦市仰加奎医院肿瘤内科2012年3月至2015年3月诊治的弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者共71例,其中HIV阳性37例,HIV阴性34例,给予CHOP方案一线化疗,对两组的临床特点及疗效进行分析。
    结果  与HIV阴性组相比,HIV阳性组B症状发生率高(56.8% vs. 29.4%; P=0.020),更容易出现胃 肠道(37.8% vs. 14.7%; P=0.028)、肝(29.7% vs. 9.7%; P=0.027)、肺(27.0% vs. 9.7%; P=0.048)浸润。HIV阳性组与HIV阴性组治疗完全缓解率分别为18.9%(7/37)与41.2%(14/34)(P=0.040);客观有效率分别为48.6%(18/37)与70.6%(24/34)(P=0.060)。HIV阳性组化疗后出现贫血、白细胞下降及继发感染比例高于HIV阴性组(均P<0.05)。HIV阳性组中有24例在确诊淋巴瘤前已给予高效价抗逆转录病毒治疗(highly active antiretroviral therapy,HAART)治疗,13例确诊后给予HARRT治疗,其客观有效率分别为41.7%和61.5%(P=0.248)。CD4+细胞数>200/mm3和≤200/mm3患者,其客观有效率分别为71.4%和34.8%(P=0.031)。
    结论  HIV阳性患者就诊时表现出更强的侵袭性。结合HARRT治疗,CHOP方案可使HIV阳性患者达到类似于HIV阴性患者的客观有效率,但完全缓解率低。HIV阳性组患者HARRT起始治疗时间不影响近期疗效。CD4+细胞数低是近期疗效不良的预测因素。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  To compare the clinical features and short-term efficacy between diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) of HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected patients.
    Methods  We collected the data of 71 patients with DLBCL in Botswana from March 2012 to March 2015. Clinical manifestation,therapy and efficacy of CHOP in the first-line treatment were compared between patients with (n=37) and without (n=34) HIV.
    Results  There were differences between HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected patients regarding the following features: B-symptoms incidence (56.8% vs. 29.4%; P=0.020),extranodal involvement: gastrointestinal (37.8% vs. 14.7%; P=0.028),Liver(29.7% vs. 9.7%; P=0.027),Lung(27.0% vs. 9.7%; P=0.048). The complete response (CR) rate was better in non-HIV-infected than that in HIV-infected patients (41.2% vs. 18.9%; P=0.040) and there was a trend for more non-HIV-infected patients to have high objective response rate (ORR) than HIV-infected patients (70.6% vs. 48.6%; P=0.060). More HIV-infected patients had anemia,leukocytopenia,infection (P<0.05). HIV-infected patients were classified according to the time of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HARRT) onset,on HARRT (n=24) and not on HARRT (n=13) at DLBCL diagnosis; Time of HARRT onset had no effect on ORR (41.7% vs. 61.5%; P=0.248). The ORR was better in CD4+>200/mm3 patients than that in CD4+≤200/mm3 patients (71.4% vs. 34.8%; P=0.031).
    Conclusion  HIV-infected DLBCL patients have more aggressive features and they can achieve similar ORR as their HIV-negative counterparts when they receive CHOP regimen. But the CR rate is worse in HIV-infected than that in non-HIV-infected patients. In HIV-infected patients,the time of HARRT onset has no effect on the short term efficacy. Low CD4+ count is the adverse predictor of short term efficacy.

     

/

返回文章
返回