高级搜索
吉非替尼耐药后加量疗法对比更换厄洛替尼治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2014, 41(11): 1223-1226. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2014.11.014
引用本文: 吉非替尼耐药后加量疗法对比更换厄洛替尼治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2014, 41(11): 1223-1226. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2014.11.014
Clinical Responses to Increasing Dose of Gefitinib or Erlotinib after Gefitinib Failure in Treatment for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Resistance to Gefitnib[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2014, 41(11): 1223-1226. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2014.11.014
Citation: Clinical Responses to Increasing Dose of Gefitinib or Erlotinib after Gefitinib Failure in Treatment for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Resistance to Gefitnib[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2014, 41(11): 1223-1226. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2014.11.014

吉非替尼耐药后加量疗法对比更换厄洛替尼治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察

Clinical Responses to Increasing Dose of Gefitinib or Erlotinib after Gefitinib Failure in Treatment for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Resistance to Gefitnib

  • 摘要: 目的 观察吉非替尼常规剂量耐药的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者加量应用吉非替尼或更换厄洛替尼的疗效。方法 选择2007年6月—2012年5月大连医科大学附属第一医院收治的40例吉非替尼常规治疗超过6月后出现耐药非小细胞肺癌患者为研究对象,随机分为两组,吉非替尼加量组20例,厄洛替尼换药组20例。观察两组的疗效及不良反应。结果 加量组与换药组疗效分别为CR0例,PR2例,SD11例,PD7例和CR0例,PR0例,SD13例, PD7例,PFS分别为9.1月,3.0月(P<0.05);两组不良反应为轻度皮疹与腹泻。预后分析表明加量治疗或换药治疗均为预后的独立影响因子。结论 对于吉非替尼常规治疗有效的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,吉非替尼加量疗法和更换厄洛替尼疗法均能使患者再次获益,加量疗法在提高患者的PFS方面更有优势。

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy of increasing dose of gefitinib or erlotinib after gefitinib failure in the treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with resistance to routine dose of gefitnib. Methods A total of 40 patients with non-small cell lung cancer with resistance to routine dose of gefitinib after treatment for more than 6 months in The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from June 2007 to May 2012 were enrolled. They were equally randomized into two groups, one group treated with increasing dose of gefitinib, and the other group treated with erlotinib. The clinical efficacy and incidence of adverse reaction were comparatively analyzed. Results The efficacies of increasing dose of gefitinib group and erlotinib after gefitinib failure group were CR 0 vs. 0 case, PR 2 vs. 0 case, SD 11 vs. 13 cases, PD 7 vs. 7 cases. And the median progression free survival (PFS) were 9.1 and 3.0 months, respectively(P<0.05). The most common toxic effects were skin rash and diarrhea. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that increasing dose of geftinib or erlotinib after gefitinib failure were the independent prognosis factors. Conclusion Both increasing dose of gefitinib and erlotinib after gefitinib failure can be effective treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer to gefitnib responders, but the median PFS was significant prolonged by increasing dose of gefitinib, which appears more informative than replacement therapy with erlotinib in prognosis.

     

/

返回文章
返回