高级搜索
化疗对晚期胃癌TAM、CEA、CA72-4的影响及意义[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2013, 40(01): 65-67. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2013.01.016
引用本文: 化疗对晚期胃癌TAM、CEA、CA72-4的影响及意义[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2013, 40(01): 65-67. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2013.01.016
Influence and Significance of TAM,CEA and CA72-4 for Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2013, 40(01): 65-67. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2013.01.016
Citation: Influence and Significance of TAM,CEA and CA72-4 for Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2013, 40(01): 65-67. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2013.01.016

化疗对晚期胃癌TAM、CEA、CA72-4的影响及意义

Influence and Significance of TAM,CEA and CA72-4 for Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer

  • 摘要: 目的探索化疗对晚期胃癌TAM、CEA、CA72-4的影响及临床意义。方法应用电化学免疫发光法对49例胃癌患者化疗前后血清中CEA、CA72-4进行检测;应用生化法对其血清TAM进行检测,并均与健康对照组进行比较。结果晚期胃癌患者化疗后血清中TAM、CEA、CA72-4分别为(99.00±17.00) u/ml、(24.17±7.54) ng/ml、(48.44±17.36) u/ml ;健康对照组分别为(70.00±12.00) u/ml、(4.24±1.28) ng/ml、(5.49±1.89)u/ml,两组差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01);亚组分析显示化疗有效的病例(PR+SD)化疗前后TAM 分别为(123.00±21.00)u/ml、(97.00±16.00) u/ml;CEA、CA72-4化疗前分别为(25.80±2.57)ng/ml、(47.69±13.19)u/ml ,化疗后分别为(21.56±7.87) ng/ml、(38.47±14.23) u/ml,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01,P<0.05)。临床进展的病例(PD)化疗前TAM、CEA分别为(117.00±18.00) u/ml 和(21.34±5.68) ng/ml,化疗后分别为(140.00±17.00) u/ml和(30.94±8.79) ng/ml ,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);CA72-4化疗前后分别为(41.78±11.99) u/ml和(50.34±17.06) u/ml,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论TAM、CEA、CA72-4的联合检测可作为一种评价化疗效果的早期预测指标。

     

    Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of late gastric cancer chemotherapy on expression of TAM CEA,CA72-4 and clinical significance. Methods Application of the method of electrochemical immune shine gastric cancer patients in 49 cases before and after chemotherapy was used to detect plasma CEA and CA72-4;The biochemical method was used to test plasma TAM in patients compared with controls. Results In patients with advanced stomach cancer after chemotherapy,the plasma levels of TAM,CEA,CA72-4 were (99.00±17.00) u/ml,(24.17±7.54) ng/ml,(48.44±17.36) u/ml,respectively.And in control group,they were(70.00±12.00 )u/ml,(4.24 ±1.28) ng/ml,(5.49±1.89 )u/ml respectively.There was significant difference(P<0.01).Sub group analysis showed that chemotherapy effective cases (PR+SD),the TAM level before chemotherapy or after chemotherapy was(123.00±21.00)u/ml or (97.00±16.00) u/ml,respectively;CEA and CA72-4 were (25.80±2.57) ng/ml,(47.69±13.19) u/ml or (21.56 ±7.87) ng/ml,(38.47± 14.23)u/ml,respectively.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.01,P<0.05).In clinical progress of cases (PD),the levels of TAM and CEA before chemotherapy or after chemotherapy were(117.00±18.00)u/ml and(21.34±5.68) ng/ml or were (140.00±17.00 )u/ml and (30.94±8.79)ng/ml,respectively.The difference had statistical significance (P<0.01);CA72-4 before or after chemotherapy was (41.78±11.99 )u/ml or(50.34±17.06 )u/ml,respectively.The difference was also statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion TAM,CEA,CA72-4 united detection can be used as evaluation index of chemotherapy curative effect for earlier forecast.

     

/

返回文章
返回