高级搜索
适形调强放疗联合PF方案同步治疗中晚期食管癌[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2010, 37(09): 1070-1072. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2010.09.026
引用本文: 适形调强放疗联合PF方案同步治疗中晚期食管癌[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2010, 37(09): 1070-1072. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2010.09.026
Treatment for Medium and Late Stage Esophageal Cancer Using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Combined with PF Chemotheraphy[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2010, 37(09): 1070-1072. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2010.09.026
Citation: Treatment for Medium and Late Stage Esophageal Cancer Using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Combined with PF Chemotheraphy[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2010, 37(09): 1070-1072. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2010.09.026

适形调强放疗联合PF方案同步治疗中晚期食管癌

Treatment for Medium and Late Stage Esophageal Cancer Using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Combined with PF Chemotheraphy

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨适形调强放疗(IMRT)联合PF方案同步治疗中晚期食管癌的临床价值。方法 将77例中晚期食管癌患者随机分两组研究。A组采用适形调强放疗+PF方案化疗,共37例。B组采用常规放疗+PF方案化疗,共40例。A、B两组均采用PF方案化疗,在放疗第1、5周使用DDP每天30 mg/m2,5-Fu 每天0.5 g/m2,静脉滴注3天,放疗不间断。两组放射剂量均为DT 66Gy,6~7周完成。结果 A组有效率(CR+PR)89.2%,B组有效率65.0%;A组的1、2、3年生存率为83%、65%、51%,B组的1、2、3年生存率为72%、53%、32%,A、B两组差异均存在明显的统计学意义。χ2分别为7.18和5.53,P均<0.05。两组的急性放射性食管炎等不良反应基本相同,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.08,P>0.05)。但两组的急性放射性肺炎差异有明显统计学意义(χ2=8.99,P<0.01)。结论 在中晚期食管癌的治疗中,调强放疗联合化疗与常规放化疗联合相比较,具有疗效好、不良反应轻,患者容易耐受等特点,调强放疗在不增加放疗不良反应的同时,能提高靶区的剂量及局控率,降低局部复发率,对总生存率的提高亦有益处。

     

    Abstract: Objective To explore the clinical value of intensity modulated radiation therapy(IMRT)combined with PF chemotherapy for medium and late stage esophageal cancer. Methods Seventy-seven patients with medium and late stage esophageal cancer patients were randomly divided into two groups.37 patients in Group A were treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy plus PF chemotherapy.Forty patients in Group B were treated with conventional radiotherapy plus PF chemotherapy.Both group A and group B received the chemotherapy of PF regimen.All patients received DDP 30 mg/(m2·day),5-Fu 0.5 g/(m2·day) in the first and fifth week of radiotherapy by Intravenous infusion 3 days. Radiotherapy didn't stop. Radiation dose for all patients were DT66Gy, 6 ~ 7 weeks to complete. Results The overall response rate(CR+PR) was 89.2% in Group A,but 65% in Group B.The χ2 value is 7.18 and P<0.05.The 1-year,2-year and 3-year survival rate was 83%,65% and 51% respectively,in Group A. And 72%,53% and 32%,respectively, in Group B.There were significantly statistical difference between two groups(χ2=5.53,P<0.05).Acute radiation-induced esophagitis were not statistical different between two groups(χ2=0.08,P>0.05).The acute radiation-induced pulmonitis in Group A was significantly higher than that in Group B(χ2=8.99,P<0.01). Conclusion Intensity modulated radiation therapy(IMRT)combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of medium and late esophageal cancer has higher efficacy,less side effects and better-tolerance,in contrast with conventional radiotherapy plus chemotherapy.IMRT can increase not only radiation dose for target and local control rate,but also the survival rate without increasing the side effects of radiotherapy.

     

/

返回文章
返回