高级搜索
多瑞吉治疗中晚期癌症疼痛的临床疗效与生活质量分析[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2007, 34(03): 207-208. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.1533
引用本文: 多瑞吉治疗中晚期癌症疼痛的临床疗效与生活质量分析[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2007, 34(03): 207-208. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.1533
The Analysis of Clinic Effects and Quality of Life in the Treatment for Moderate to Sever Cancer Pain[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2007, 34(03): 207-208. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.1533
Citation: The Analysis of Clinic Effects and Quality of Life in the Treatment for Moderate to Sever Cancer Pain[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2007, 34(03): 207-208. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.1533

多瑞吉治疗中晚期癌症疼痛的临床疗效与生活质量分析

The Analysis of Clinic Effects and Quality of Life in the Treatment for Moderate to Sever Cancer Pain

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨多瑞吉与美施康定治疗中、重度癌症疼痛的疗效与生活质量。方法 将126例中、重度癌症疼痛的患者随机分两组,分别接受多瑞吉(A组)与美施康定(B组)治疗,并记录其疗效、副作用及生存质量。结果 多瑞吉与美施康定的疼痛缓解率分别为88.89%、87.30%,疼痛缓解率与生活质量差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。多瑞吉组中的恶心、便秘的副作用发生率则低于美施康定(P〈0.01)。结论 多瑞吉是治疗中、重度癌症疼痛的安全、可靠、副作用小的药物。

     

    Abstract: Objective  To investigate the efficacy, side effects and quality of life between transdermal fentanyl plaster (Durogesic) and sustained release morphine tablet (MS-Contin) in the treatment for moderate to sever cancer pain. Methods  126 patients were randomized into Durogesic group (group A) and MS-Contin group (group B) . The two groups received Durogesic and MS-contin respectively. Then the efficacy, side effects and quality of life were recorded. Results  The difference of the effective rates and quality of life of Durogesic and MS-Contin were not significant . However, the incidence of vomit and constipation were significantly higher in the MS-Contin group than that of in the Durogesic group . Conclusion  The Durogesic is a drug that is safe, reliable and has little side effect in treating moderate to sever cancer pain.

     

/

返回文章
返回