DMP方案与DVP方案治疗食管癌54例疗效对比分析
Comparison Between and Analysis of DMP Protocol & DVP Regimen In Curative Effects on 54 Cases or Cancer of the Esophagus
-
摘要: 我们自1986年1月~1992年6月,用DMP方案(DDP,MMC,PYM)和DVP方案(DDP,VCR,PYM)共治疗食管癌54例.其中DMP方案治疗19例,获RR57.7%,RRR84.2%.DVP方案治疗35例,获RR45.7%,RRR60%.经统计学处理,两方案的完全缓解率,有效率及毒副反应无统计学意义(P>0.05).但从有效率看,DMP方案稍高于DVP方案,DMP方案对初治病人和术后复发转移病人的疗效亦略优于DVP方案.
-
关键词:
- 食管癌 /
- 联合化疗 /
- DMP方案与DVP方案
Abstract: From Jan. 1986 to June 1992, the DMP protocol (DDP, MMC,PYM) and the DVP regimen (DDP, VCR, PYM) were used by us in the management of 54 cases of cancer of the esophagus.of them, 19 cases were treated with the DMP protocol, achieving a 57. 7N RR and a 84.2% RRR; and 35 cases were treated with the DVP regimen, ending in a 45. 7% RR and a 60% RRR. Both of the two regimens were of no statistical significance in terms of complete remission, effective rate and toxic and side effects (P0. 05).There was remarkable difference seen in the total rate of effectiveness from the two methods. The DMP way was superior to the DVP way (P0.05 ). The curative effect of DMP is slightly better than that of DVP, and it is the same in the cases first treated and in those who had relapse and/or metastasis post operation. -
-
1. Kelsen D. Chemotherapy of esophageal cancer. Seminars in oncology, 1984, 11: 159 2. 全国卡铂临床试验协作组.卡铂治疗恶性肿瘤的临床报告.中华肺瘤杂志,1990, 5: 321 3. 樊青霞,等.顺氯氮铂,丝裂霉素和平阳霉素联合治疗食管癌41例结果.肿瘤防治研究,1991, 18(2): 109 4. Kelsen D. P, et al. Cisplatin. Vindesine and Bleomycin (DVB) combination chemotherapy for esophageal carcinoma cancer Treat Rep, 1981, 65 (9-10): 781 5. 范魁生,等.食管癌的顺氯氮铂,平阳霉素和长春新硷联合化疗.河南肿瘤学杂志,1988, (l): 27 6. 王绵英,等.PYM.VCR.DDP联合用药的实验研究.河南医科大学学报,1986, 21(4): 286 7. 李珊珊,等.食管癌化疗体外药敏试验方法.河南肿瘤学杂志,1991, 4: (2)10
计量
- 文章访问数: 1107
- HTML全文浏览量: 39
- PDF下载量: 243
下载:
