高级搜索

肿瘤间质比联合KRAS/NRAS/BRAF基因状态在结直肠癌患者预后评估中的临床价值

Clinical Value of Tumor-Stroma Ratio Combined with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF Gene Status in Prognostic Assessment of Patients with Colorectal Cancer

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨肿瘤间质比(TSR)联合KRASBRAFNRAS及微卫星状态在结直肠癌患者预后评估中的临床价值。
    方法 共纳入51例符合纳排标准的结直肠癌病例。通过光学显微镜评估TSR水平。根据基因检测结果确定KRAS/NRAS/BRAF突变谱及微卫星状态。记录临床资料、病理学特点和生存数据行统计学分析。
    结果 51例结直肠癌患者中,低间质组19例(37.3%),高间质组32例(62.7%)。两组间耐药情况、M分期、TNM分期、神经侵犯、微卫星状态的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与高TSR的肿瘤患者相比,低TSR肿瘤患者的复发率更高(65.62% vs. 26.32%, P=0.007),无病生存期(14.34 m vs. 34.21 m,P=0.001)及总生存期(23.09 m vs. 38.79 m,P=0.021)更短,差异有统计学意义。多因素Cox回归分析显示:N分期、M分期、TNM分期、神经侵犯、脉管浸润、TSR等可作为无病生存期的独立危险因素;N分期、M分期、神经侵犯、脉管浸润、TSR等是影响患者总生存期的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。TSR联合KRAS、TSR联合NRAS、TSR联合BRAF、TSR联合微卫星状态的模型整体显著(P<0.05),但各组中哑变量差异均无统计学意义。
    结论 TSR是晚期结直肠癌患者预后不良的独立预测因子,低TSR较高TSR的患者更易复发转移;对结肠癌术后复发接受一线姑息化疗患者的原发灶进行TSR评估具有预后价值,可作为评估患者治疗耐药的相关因素。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the clinical value of tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) in combination with KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and microsatellite status for prognostic assessment of patients with colorectal cancer.
    Methods A total of 51 colorectal cancer cases meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. TSR levels were evaluated through optical microscopy. The KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation profiles and microsatellite status were determined in accordance with genetic testing results. Clinical data, pathological characteristics, and survival outcomes were systematically recorded.
    Results Among the 51 patients with colorectal cancer, 19 (37.3%) were categorized into the low stromal group and 32 (62.7%) into the high stromal group. Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in drug resistance, M stage, TNM stage, neural invasion, and microsatellite status (P<0.05). Compared with patients exhibiting high TSR, those with low TSR demonstrated significantly increased recurrence rates (5 vs. 21 cases, P=0.007), shortened disease-free survival (34.21 vs. 14.34 months, P=0.001), and reduced overall survival (38.79 vs. 23.09 months, P=0.021). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified N stage, M stage, TNM stage, neural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and TSR as independent risk factors for disease-free survival. N stage, M stage, neural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and TSR emerged as independent prognostic factors for overall survival (P<0.05). Although the combined models of TSR with KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and microsatellite status, respectively, demonstrated overall statistical significance (P<0.05), none of the dummy variables in these models reached individually statistical significance (P>0.05), and therefore cannot be considered independent prognostic factors.
    Conclusion TSR serves as an independent predictor of poor prognosis in advanced colorectal cancer, with patients exhibiting low TSR demonstrating a significantly higher risk of recurrence and metastasis than those with high TSR. For patients with colon cancer undergoing first-line palliative chemotherapy after postoperative recurrence, histopathological assessment of TSR in primary tumor sites holds prognostic value and may serve as a relevant factor for evaluating treatment resistance in clinical management.

     

/

返回文章
返回