高级搜索

培唑帕尼联合化疗治疗晚期滑膜肉瘤的近期疗效及安全性分析

王晶

王晶. 培唑帕尼联合化疗治疗晚期滑膜肉瘤的近期疗效及安全性分析[J]. 肿瘤防治研究. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2025.24.1199
引用本文: 王晶. 培唑帕尼联合化疗治疗晚期滑膜肉瘤的近期疗效及安全性分析[J]. 肿瘤防治研究. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2025.24.1199
Jing WANG. Analysis of short-term efficacy and safety of pazopanib combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced synovial sarcoma[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2025.24.1199
Citation: Jing WANG. Analysis of short-term efficacy and safety of pazopanib combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced synovial sarcoma[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2025.24.1199

培唑帕尼联合化疗治疗晚期滑膜肉瘤的近期疗效及安全性分析

Analysis of short-term efficacy and safety of pazopanib combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced synovial sarcoma

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨培唑帕尼联合化疗治疗晚期滑膜肉瘤(SS)的近期疗效及安全性。方法 选取2018年1月至2023年12月,本院应用培唑帕尼联合化疗治疗晚期滑膜肉瘤患者64例,其中,采取一线化疗方案26例、二线化疗方案19例、三线化疗方案19例,一线化疗药物有蒽环类药物和异环磷酰胺,二、三线化疗药物有长春新碱、多西他赛、吉西他滨、顺铂和达卡巴嗪等。每用药6周,对治疗效果和安全性进行评价。结果 64例患者中,33例患者部分缓解(partial response,PR),12例患者疾病稳定(stable disease,SD),19例患者疾病进展(progression disease,PD),其客观缓解率(objective response rat,ORR)和疾病控制率(disease control rate,DCR)分别为51.5%(33/64)和70.3%(45/64),中位PFS 7.55个月(95%CI:6.320~8.780个月)。采用一线方案的26例患者中,其ORR为65.4%(17/26),DCR为73.1%(19/26),中位PFS 9.167个月(95%CI:6.362~11.971个月);采用二线方案的19例患者,其ORR为47.4%(9/19),DCR为73.7%(14/19),中位PFS 7.55月(95%CI:6.054~9.046个月);三线方案的19例患者,其ORR为36.8%(7/19),DCR为63.1%(12/19),中位PFS 6.09月(95%CI:3.158~9.022个月)。常见不良反应有乏力、肝功能损害、高血压、发色改变、造血系统毒性、腹泻及手足综合征等,但均以Ⅰ/Ⅱ级为主,Ⅲ/Ⅳ级不良事件很少出现,治疗过程中没有死亡案例。结论 培唑帕尼联合化疗治疗晚期滑膜肉瘤的疗效较好,不良反应可以接受,是不错的治疗选择之一,值得进一步开展前瞻临床研究。
     

     

    Abstract: Purpose To investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of pazopanib combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced synovial sarcoma (SS). Methods A total of 64 patients with advanced synovial sarcoma treated with pazopanib combined with chemotherapy at our hospital from January 2018 to December 2023 were selected. Among them, 26 patients received first-line chemotherapy, 19 patients received second-line chemotherapy, and 19 patients received third-line chemotherapy. First-line chemotherapy regimens included anthracyclines and ifosfamide, while second-line and third-line chemotherapy drugs used included vincristine, docetaxel, gemcitabine, cisplatin, and dacarbazine. Therapeutic efficacy and safety were evaluated every 6 weeks. Results Out of the 64 patients, 33 achieved partial response (PR), 12 had stable disease (SD), and 19 experienced progression disease (PD). The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 51.5%(33/64) and 70.3%(45/64), respectively, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.55 months (95%CI: 6.320~8.780 months). Among the 26 patients treated with the first-line regimen, ORR was 65.4%(17/26), DCR was 73.1%(19/26), and median PFS was 9.167 months (95% CI: 6.362~11.971 months). For the 19 patients receiving second-line therapy, ORR was 47.4%(9/19) DCR was 73.7%(14/19), and median PFS was 7.55 months (95% CI: 6.054~9.046 months). Among the 19 patients treated with the third-line regimen, ORR was 36.8%(7/19), DCR was 63.1%(12/19), and median PFS was 6.09 months (95% CI: 3.158~9.022 months). Common adverse events included fatigue, liver function impairment, hypertension, hair color changes, hematopoietic system

     

计量
  • 文章访问数:  282
  • HTML全文浏览量:  45
  • PDF下载量:  65
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-11-26
  • 修回日期:  2024-12-12
  • 录用日期:  2025-02-11
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-02-16

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    x 关闭 永久关闭