高级搜索

直肠神经内分泌肿瘤的危险因素分析及风险预测模型建立

Risk Factor and Risk Prediction Modeling of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors

  • 摘要:
    目的 分析直肠神经内分泌肿瘤(RNETs)发病相关危险因素并构建风险预测模型。
    方法 收集在河北省承德市中心医院接受电子结肠镜检查的患者的临床信息,对比RNETs患者及非RNETs患者的临床资料,纳入可能导致RNETs的危险因素,应用二元Logistic回归分析相关危险因素后建立风险预测模型。
    结果 164例患者中有66例患RNETs、98例随机抽样获得的非RNETs者。单因素Logistic回归分析结果表明:年龄、脂肪肝、焦虑和(或)抑郁、总胆固醇水平、甘油三酯水平和癌胚抗原水平为RNETs发病的影响因素(P<0.05),多因素Logistic回归分析结果表明:年龄(P=0.015)、焦虑抑郁(P=0.031)、总胆固醇水平(P=0.009)、脂肪肝(P=0.001)、癌胚抗原(P<0.001)为RNETs患病的独立危险因素。将原始数据按7∶3比例随机分为训练集与测试集后,用训练集构建列线图预测模型,测试集用于模型内部验证。训练集与测试集AUC分别为0.843和0.772,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),表明模型区分度较好。训练集和测试集的校准曲线显示模型预测概率与实际概率接近,提示模型具有良好的预测性能。训练集和测试集的决策曲线分析(DCA)显示,在0.2至0.7的阈值范围内,模型的临床决策净获益较高。
    结论 年轻、脂肪肝、较高的总胆固醇水平、癌胚抗原水平以及焦虑抑郁是RNETs发生的独立危险因素。根据上述危险因素构建的列线图模型预测患者RNETs的能力较强,可以根据预测概率值考虑是否进行临床干预。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To analyze the risk factors associated with the occurrence of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (RNETs) and construct a risk prediction model.
    Methods Clinical data of patients who underwent electronic colonoscopy were collected. The clinical information on patients with and without RNETs were compared, and potential risk factors for RNETs were identified. Binary logistic regression was performed to analyze the relevant risk factors and construct a risk prediction model.
    Results Among 164 patients, 66 were diagnosed with RNETs, and 98 who did not have such a condition were randomly selected. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age, fatty liver, anxiety and depression, total cholesterol, triglyceride levels, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were significant factors influencing the occurrence of RNETs (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age (P=0.015), anxiety and depression (P=0.031), cholesterol level (P=0.009), fatty liver (P=0.001), and CEA (P<0.001) as independent risk factors for RNETs. The participants were randomly divided into training and test sets at a 7:3 ratio. The training set was used to construct a nomogram-based risk prediction model, and the testing set was used for internal validation. The area under the curve values for the training and testing sets were 0.843 and 0.772, respectively (P>0.05). These findings indicate a good discriminative performance. The calibration curves for the training and testing sets were in good agreement with the 45° standard line, which suggests that the predicted probabilities were consistent with the actual outcomes. Decision curve analysis showed that the model provided a high net benefit within a threshold range of 0.2 to 0.7 for clinical decision making.
    Conclusion Young age, fatty liver, high CEA levels, high cholesterol levels, and anxiety and depression are independent risk factors for RNETs. The nomogram model constructed based on these risk factors exhibits a strong capability to predict the occurrence of RNETs, and clinical intervention can be considered based on the predicted probability values.

     

/

返回文章
返回