高级搜索

胸腔镜肺叶切除术中肺动、静脉切断顺序对非小细胞肺癌患者手术疗效与安全性影响的系统评价

白向豆, 洪子强, 崔百强, 杨宁, 贺晓阳, 金大成, 苟云久

白向豆, 洪子强, 崔百强, 杨宁, 贺晓阳, 金大成, 苟云久. 胸腔镜肺叶切除术中肺动、静脉切断顺序对非小细胞肺癌患者手术疗效与安全性影响的系统评价[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2023, 50(1): 69-74. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2023.22.0593
引用本文: 白向豆, 洪子强, 崔百强, 杨宁, 贺晓阳, 金大成, 苟云久. 胸腔镜肺叶切除术中肺动、静脉切断顺序对非小细胞肺癌患者手术疗效与安全性影响的系统评价[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2023, 50(1): 69-74. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2023.22.0593
BAI Xiangdou, HONG Ziqiang, CUI Baiqiang, YANG Ning, HE Xiaoyang, JIN Dacheng, GOU Yunjiu. Effect of Sequence of Pulmonary Artery and Vein Transection in Thoracoscopic Lobectomy on Efficacy and Safety of Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Evaluation[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2023, 50(1): 69-74. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2023.22.0593
Citation: BAI Xiangdou, HONG Ziqiang, CUI Baiqiang, YANG Ning, HE Xiaoyang, JIN Dacheng, GOU Yunjiu. Effect of Sequence of Pulmonary Artery and Vein Transection in Thoracoscopic Lobectomy on Efficacy and Safety of Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Evaluation[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2023, 50(1): 69-74. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2023.22.0593

胸腔镜肺叶切除术中肺动、静脉切断顺序对非小细胞肺癌患者手术疗效与安全性影响的系统评价

基金项目: 

甘肃省人民医院国家级科研项目培育计划一般项目 19SYPYB-28

甘肃省卫生行业科研计划项目 GSWSKY2017-56

甘肃省科技计划项目 20JR10RA388

详细信息
    作者简介:

    白向豆(1996-),男,硕士在读,主要从事胸部肿瘤的治疗

    通讯作者:

    苟云久(1974-),男,博士,主任医师,主要从事胸部肿瘤的微创手术治疗,E-mail: gouyunjiu@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R734.2

Effect of Sequence of Pulmonary Artery and Vein Transection in Thoracoscopic Lobectomy on Efficacy and Safety of Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Evaluation

Funding: 

Gansu Provincial People's Hospital National scientific research project training program general project 19SYPYB-28

Gansu Province Health Industry Research Plan Project GSWSKY2017-56

Gansu Provincial Science and Technology Planning Project 20JR10RA388

More Information
  • 摘要:
    目的 

    系统评价胸腔镜下肺叶切除术中肺动、静脉切断顺序对非小细胞肺癌患者手术的疗效与安全性。

    方法 

    检索PubMed、EMbase、Web of Science、The Cochrane Library、中国知网、万方、维普和CBM数据库,搜索关于胸腔镜下肺叶切除术中肺动、静脉切断顺序对非小细胞肺癌手术后疗效的研究,检索时限均为建库至2022年5月。采用RevMan 5.4软件进行Meta分析。

    结果 

    最终纳入8篇文献,其中包括3篇随机对照研究、5篇队列研究,总共包含1 810例患者。Meta分析结果显示:术中优先离断肺静脉组在手术时间(MD=13.34, 95%CI(7.36, 19.32), P < 0.0001)、术中出血量(MD=45.29, 95%CI(40.24, 50.35), P < 0.0001)方面均显著高于优先离断肺动脉组,且差异具有统计学意义。但是优先离断肺静脉组患者的OS(HR=1.34, 95%CI(1.12, 1.60),P=0.001)和DFS(HR=1.44, 95%CI(1.18, 1.76), P=0.0003)获益均显著优于肺动脉组,差异有统计学意义。

    结论 

    胸腔镜下肺叶切除术中优先离断肺静脉有效提高了患者的OS与DFS,使非小细胞肺癌患者获得更高的生存获益,但是术中出血与手术时间相对优先离断肺动脉时更多。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective 

    To systematically evaluate the effect of sequence of pulmonary artery and vein transection in thoracoscopic lobectomy on the efficacy and safety of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

    Methods 

    PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and CBM databases were searched for the researches on The post-operative efficacy of pulmonary arteriovenous and pulmonary vein resection sequence in thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. The retrieval time is from the database construction to May 2022. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.

    Results 

    Eight articles were included, including 3 randomized controlled studies and 5 cohort studies, with a total of 1810 patients. Meta-analysis results showed that: The operative time (MD=13.34, 95%CI(7.36, 19.32), P < 0.0001) and intraoperative blood loss (MD=45.29, 95%CI(40.24, 50.35), P < 0.0001) in the group with priority pulmonary vein resection were significantly higher than those in the group with priority pulmonary vein resection. The difference was statistically significant. However, the benefits of OS (HR=1.34, 95%CI (1.12, 1.60), P=0.001) and DFS (HR=1.44, 95%CI(1.18, 1.76), P=0.0003) in the group of priority pulmonary vein transection were significantly better than those in the group of priority pulmonary artery transection, with statistically significant differences.

    Conclusion 

    Priority pulmonary vein transection during thoracoscopic lobectomy effectively improved patients' OS and DFS, resulting in higher survival benefit for patients with non-small cell lung cancer, but intraoperative bleeding and operation time are more than those with priority pulmonary artery transection.

     

  • 乳腺癌是全球范围内女性发病率最高的一种恶性肿瘤,在女性癌症相关死因中居第二位[1]。中国乳腺癌的发病率占世界总发病率的12.2%,死亡率高达9.6%,严重危害我国女性的身体健康和生活质量[2]。三阴性乳腺癌(triple negative breast cancer, TNBC)是指雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)和人类表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)均呈阴性表达的乳腺癌,恶性程度高,容易发生转移[3-4]。虽然目前对乳腺癌的诊断及治疗已取得一定成效,但三阴性乳腺癌的患者在1~3年内极易复发,并且大多于治疗后的5年内死亡[5]。针对以上问题,快速、准确地找到TNBC更有效的生物靶标成为关键所在。

    环状RNA(circRNA)是生物体内广泛存在的一类具有调节功能的非编码RNA[6]。它们一般头尾连接形成环状结构,因为不含5' 末端帽和3' 末端poly(A)尾而表达稳定[7-8]。第一个环状RNA ciRS-7(CDR1as)由Hansen等首次发现,其可作为miR-7海绵在大脑中稳定表达并发挥重要的基因调控功能[9]。最近有研究发现,ciRS-7敲除后的体内动物模型出现了miR-7和miR-671表达失调,最终影响哺乳动物的大脑发育功能[10]。ciRS-7主要通过miRNA海绵的方式调节miR-7的表达,进而影响肿瘤的发生发展过程[9]。越来越多的研究发现环状RNA可调节人类多种肿瘤的进展。三阴性乳腺癌作为一类高度恶性的肿瘤,其潜在的分子机制仍有待阐明,而且环状RNA对其发病的调控作用尚未见报道。

    本研究旨在探讨环状RNA ciRS-7在三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)中的表达及其对细胞侵袭和迁移的影响,为寻找TNBC新型肿瘤生物标志物和治疗靶标奠定基础。

    选取2016年9月—2017年10月在河北医科大学第四医院接受手术治疗的乳腺癌患者132例,其中Luminal型89例、TNBC25例和HER2过表达型18例。所有患者均未接受术前化疗和放疗。所有肿瘤组织均由经验丰富的病理学专家证实。所有患者均签署了知情同意书,研究方案征得医院伦理委员会批准。

    人乳腺癌细胞株MDA-MB-231、MDA-MB-453、BT-549和MCF-7购自美国ATCC细胞库。RPMI 1640培养基、胰蛋白酶购自美国Gibco公司,胎牛血清购自上海依科赛生物制品有限公司。TRIzol购自美国Invitrogen公司,Platinum SYBR Super Mix试剂、Fu GENE HD转染试剂及反转录试剂盒均购自美国Promega公司,PCR引物购自英潍捷基贸易有限公司。Transwell小室(孔径3.0 μm)购自美国Corning公司,Matrigel基质胶购自美国BD公司。ciRS-7 siRNA购自广州锐博生物科技公司。

    乳腺癌组织和细胞用TRIzol裂解后提取总RNA,按照Promega反转录试剂盒说明书制备cDNA,然后进行实时荧光定量PCR扩增,以GAPDH为内参,环状RNA ciRS-7来源于CDR1as,于是本实验设计两种引物,一种为发散引物,可扩增出环状转录本ciRS-7,另一种为聚合引物,能扩增CDR1as的线性转录本。然后以任意两例TNBC组织和两种TNBC细胞系(MDA-MB-231和BT-549)的cDNA和基因组DNA(gDNA)为模板,进行普通PCR反应。目的基因的引物序列及反应条件见表 1。利用各实验组目的基因及内参基因的Ct值,按照公式ΔCt=Ct目的基因-Ct内参基因,以2-ΔΔCt法计算目的基因的相对表达量。

    表  1  PCR引物序列及反应条件
    Table  1  PCR primer sequences and reaction requirement
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格

    如1.3提取细胞总RNA后反转录为cDNA,PCR扩增,GAPDH为内参,目的基因的引物序列及反应条件,见表 1。扩增产物经2%琼脂糖凝胶电泳分离后进行核酸显色。

    人TNBC细胞株MDA-MB-231和BT-549用含10%胎牛血清、100 u/ml青霉素和100 μg/ml链霉素的RPMI 1640培养液培养,于37℃、5%CO2体积分数的培养箱中。按Fu GENE HD转染试剂说明书方法将ciRS-7 siRNA转染至MDA-MB-231和BT-549细胞中,并在两种细胞中分别转染control siRNA作为对照。

    收集对数期的MDA-MB-231和BT-549细胞,调整细胞密度为5×105个每毫升,取2 ml接种于6孔板,并在6孔板背面划5条平行线做标记,24 h后用200 μl枪头在细胞中划2条垂直于背面平行线的直线,PBS冲洗2次,加入2 ml无胎牛血清的RPMI 1640培养液,于0、24 h在倒置显微镜下观察细胞向划痕中间迁移的距离并拍照,每组实验设3个平行孔。

    取对数期生长的细胞悬液,加入Transwell小室的上室(2×105个/小室),小室上铺胶检测侵袭能力,不铺胶者检测迁移能力; 下室加入600 μl含10%胎牛血清的RPMI 1640培养液,常规培养48 h,用棉签擦净上室细胞,PBS清洗后,结晶紫染色,倒置相差显微镜下(×200)观察并拍照,随机选取5个视野,计数穿膜细胞数。

    所有动物实验均经河北医科大学第四医院动物保护委员会批准。选用4周龄BALB/c裸鼠,随机分为2组(每组8只)。用si ciRS-7或对照siRNA转染的MDA-MB-231细胞(每只小鼠5×106个细胞)分别经尾静脉注射BALB/ c裸鼠中。然后将50 OD胆固醇修饰的siciRS-7或对照siRNA经尾静脉注射到BALB/c裸鼠中(每周2次)。2月后处死裸鼠,解剖肺组织。肉眼检查肺的外观,然后进行HE染色,并在显微镜下观察每个视野肺组织切片的转移克隆数。

    上述实验均重复3次。

    本实验数据应用SPSS21.0软件进行统计分析,计量资料以均数±标准(x±s)表示,两组之间均数比较采用t检验,P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。

    结果显示,环状转录本ciRS-7只能用发散引物在cDNA中检测到,gDNA中未见扩增产物; 但是线性形式的CDR1as在cDNA和gDNA中均出现了扩增产物,见图 1AB。这说明本研究使用的环状RNA ciRS-7引物的有效性,并进一步验证了其在TNBC中具有一定的表达丰度。qRT-PCR检测结果显示,TNBC样本中ciRS-7的相对表达量为(6.52±0.38),显著高于Luminal型(1.56±0.17)(P < 0.001)和HER2过表达型乳腺癌组织(2.27±0.66)(P < 0.001)以及癌旁正常组织(0.83±0.09)(P < 0.001),见图 1C。ciRS-7在TNBC细胞系MDA-MB-231和BT-549中高表达,但在Lunimal型MCF-7细胞和HER2过表达型MDA-MB-453细胞中低表达,见图 1D。qRT-PCR方法进一步证实ciRS-7对RNase R的抗性,MDA-MB-231和BT-549细胞经RNase R处理后CDR1线性基因表达明显下降,而环状形式的ciRS-7无明显变化,见图 1E。综上表明,环状RNA ciRS-7在TNBC组织和细胞中稳定高表达。

    图  1  环状RNA ciRS-7在乳腺癌组织和细胞中的表达
    Figure  1  Expression of circular RNA ciRS-7 in breast cancer tissues and cell lines
    A: the expression of ciRS-7 in two cases of TNBC tissues detected by RT-PCR; B: the expression of ciRS-7 in MDA-MB-231 and BT-549 cells detected by RT-PCR; C: the expression of ciRS-7 in 132 cases of breast cancer tissue and paired normal adjacent tissues detected by qRT-PCR; D: the expression of ciRS-7 in MDA-MB-231, BT-549, MCF-7 and MDA-MB-453 cells detected by qRT-PCR; E: the expression of ciRS-7 with RNase R treatment in MDA-MB-231 and BT-549 cells detected by qRT-PCR; **: P < 0.01, ***: P < 0.001

    为方便分析数据,将所有乳腺癌组织分类为ciRS-7高表达组和低表达组,使用132例乳腺癌患者组织中ciRS-7的平均相对表达量(4.82)作为所有乳腺癌患者的临界阈值。132例乳腺癌患者中ciRS-7高表达组32例,低表达组100例; ciRS-7表达与患者年龄、肿瘤直径和病理分级无关(均P > 0.05),而与分子分型、肿瘤浸润和淋巴结转移明显相关(均P < 0.05),见表 2。由此推断ciRS-7可能与乳腺癌患者的病情进展密切相关,于是本实验重点研究高表达ciRS-7且恶性度高的TNBC型乳腺癌。

    表  2  ciRS-7表达与132例乳腺癌患者临床病理学指标的相关性
    Table  2  Correlation between ciRS-7 expression and clinicopathological parameters of 132 breast cancer patients
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格

    划痕实验结果显示siRNA介导的ciRS-7敲低组MDA-MB-231和BT-549细胞的迁移能力明显被抑制,见图 2A;转染ciRS-7 siRNA后两株细胞的ciRS-7表达明显降低(均P=0.000),见图 2B,证明本研究中针对环状RNA ciRS-7 siRNA干扰有效; 实验组和对照组两株细胞迁移面积变化百分率差异具有统计学意义,见图 2C(均P=0.000)。综上表明siRNA介导的ciRS-7敲低可能抑制TNBC细胞的迁移能力。

    图  2  沉默ciRS-7对MDA-MB-231和BT-549细胞迁移的影响
    Figure  2  Effect of silencing ciRS-7 on migration of MDA-MB-231 and BT-549 cells
    A: the migration of MDA-MB-231 and BT-549 cells in each group detected by wound healing assay; B: the expression of ciRS-7 after silencing ciRS-7 in MDA-MB-231 and BT-549 cells detected by qRT-PCR; C: the migration area in each group of MDA-MB-231 and BT-549 cells; ***: P < 0.001, compared with si ctrl group

    与si ctrl组相比,si ciRS-7处理组MDA-MB-231和BT-549细胞的穿膜数目明显减少,见图 3A。MDA-MB-231和BT-549中对照组和实验组的迁移和侵袭细胞数差异均有统计学意义(均P=0.000),见图 3BC

    图  3  沉默ciRS-7对MDA-MB-231和BT-549细胞迁移和侵袭的影响
    Figure  3  Effect of silencing ciRS-7 on migration and invasion of MDA-MB-231 and BT-549 cells
    A: the migration and invasion of MDA-MB-231 and BT-549 cells in each group detected by Transwell assay; B: the number of migrated and invaded MDA-MB-231 cells in each group; C: the number of migrated and invaded BT-549 cells in each group; ***: P < 0.001, compared with si ctrl group

    通过尾静脉注射建立MDA-MB-231细胞裸鼠肺转移模型。与si ctrl组相比,si ciRS-7组裸鼠的肺转移能力明显较弱,见图 4A。显微镜下观察si ciRS-7转染组的裸鼠形成的肺转移克隆数比si ctrl转染组的明显减少(P=0.000067),见图 4B。表明敲低ciRS-7可能抑制裸鼠体内TNBC的肺转移能力。

    图  4  沉默ciRS-7对裸鼠体内TNBC的肺转移的影响
    Figure  4  Effect of silencing ciRS-7 on lung metastasis of TNBC in nude mice
    A: the metastasis clones of lung tissue in nude mice; Left: the appearance of lungs by naked eyes; Middle: HE staining(40×); Right: HE staining(100×); B: the number of clones for lung metastasis in each group; ***: P < 0.001, compared with si ctrl group

    本课题组检测了132例乳腺癌患者病理组织标本及配对癌旁正常组织中ciRS-7的表达水平,分析ciRS-7与乳腺癌患者临床病理特征之间的关系。另外检测了乳腺癌细胞系中ciRS-7的表达水平,通过体外细胞功能实验检测ciRS-7对TNBC细胞迁移和侵袭能力的影响,体内动物实验探究敲低ciRS-7后TNBC发生肺转移的变化,为寻找TNBC的新型肿瘤生物标志物和治疗靶标奠定基础。

    由于当时研究技术的局限性,环状RNA在发现之初被认为是错误剪接或内含子套索过程中形成的副产物[11-13]。近年来随着RNA测序(RNA-seq)技术的不断发展,大量环状RNA在小鼠、线虫及人类细胞中被检测到[14-15]。circRNA的功能包括与AGO蛋白结合调控mRNA的转录翻译过程[6],与RNA结合蛋白相互作用参与转录后调控[16]。还有一类位于细胞核内的环状RNA通过抑制内含子环化正向调控其宿主基因的表达[17]。但目前研究最为深入的还是其作为miRNA分子“海绵”发挥生物学功能。

    有报道称ciRS-7可作为miR-7的分子海绵参与多种癌症相关通路影响肿瘤的发生发展[18]。胃癌中ciRS-7表达上调,进而影响miR-7下游的PTEN/PI3K/AKT信号通路,促进癌症的发生发展[19]。食管鳞状细胞癌中过表达的ciRS-7可通过靶向miR-876-5p,解除其对肿瘤相关抗原MAGE-A家族的抑制作用从而加速ESCC进程[20]。结肠癌中ciRS-7可直接结合miR-7影响其下游的EGFR-RAF1信号通路,发挥关键的促癌作用[21]。ciRS-7还可通过充当miRNA分子海绵在非小细胞肺癌和膀胱癌的进展中发挥重要作用[22-23]

    然而,ciRS-7在乳腺癌中的研究未见报道。三阴性乳腺癌作为乳腺癌中具有高度转移潜能的分子类型,其调控机制至今尚未阐明。本研究采用qRT-PCR技术检测了4种乳腺癌细胞系中ciRS-7的表达水平,发现三阴性乳腺癌细胞系中ciRS-7的表达明显高于其他类型的乳腺癌细胞系,这提示ciRS-7可能与TNBC的高侵袭转移能力相关。

    为此本课题组设计了细胞迁移和侵袭试验及裸鼠转移瘤实验进一步探究ciRS-7对TNBC的侵袭和转移能力的影响。结果表明环状RNA ciRS-7在体内和体外实验中均可促进TNBC细胞的侵袭迁移水平。但其具体的分子机制尚未研究透彻,猜测其很可能通过miRNA分子海绵机制发挥调控作用,这有待在今后的研究中得到证实。

    Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
    作者贡献:
    白向豆:文献检索、数据整理与分析、论文撰写与修改
    洪子强、崔百强:数据提取、核对
    杨宁、贺晓阳:论文修订
    金大成:论文修改与润色
    苟云久:论文设计
  • 图  1   文献筛选流程图

    Figure  1   Flow diagram of literature search and selection

    图  2   胸腔镜下肺叶切除术中肺动、静离断顺序对非小细胞肺癌患者OS的影响Meta分析结果

    Figure  2   Meta-analysis of effect of the sequence of pulmonary artery and vein transection in thoracoscopic lobectomy on OS of patients with NSCLC

    图  3   胸腔镜下肺叶切除术中肺动、静离断顺序对非小细胞肺癌患者DFS的影响Meta分析结果

    Figure  3   Meta-analysis of effect of the sequence of pulmonary artery and vein transection in thoracoscopic lobectomy on DFS of patients with NSCLC

    图  4   优先离断肺动脉和优先离断肺静脉组在OS获益分析中对比的漏斗图

    Figure  4   Funnel plot of comparison between the priority pulmonary vein and artery transection groups in OS benefit analysis

    表  1   纳入文献一般资料

    Table  1   General information of the included literature

    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   RCT研究质量评价表

    Table  2   RCT study quality evaluation table

    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   胸腔镜下肺叶切除术中不同肺动、静脉离断顺序对非小细胞肺癌患者术后疗效的Meta分析结果

    Table  3   Results of Meta-analysis about the effect of sequence of the pulmonary artery and vein transection in thoracoscopic lobectomy on efficacy of patients with NSCLC

    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Manerikar A, Querrey M, Cerier E, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Surgical Approaches for Lung Cancer[J]. J Surg Res, 2021, 263: 274-284. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.10.020

    [2]

    Kim HK. Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy[J]. J Chest Surg, 2021, 54(4): 239-245. doi: 10.5090/jcs.21.061

    [3]

    Jiang Y, Su Z, Liang H, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopy for lung cancer: who is the future of thoracic surgery?[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2020, 12(8): 4427-4433. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-1116

    [4]

    Ujiie H, Gregor A, Yasufuku K. Minimally invasive surgical approaches for lung cancer[J]. Expert Rev Respir Med, 2019, 13(6): 571-578. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2019.1610399

    [5]

    Katopodis P, Anikin V, Kishore U, et al. Circulating tumour cells and circulating cell-free DNA in patients with lung cancer: a comparison between thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery[J]. BMJ Open Respir Res, 2021, 8(1): e000917. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-000917

    [6] 姚成才, 姜杰, 赵德平, 等. 肺癌术中肺血管结扎顺序对肺癌微转移影响的研究[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2010, 17(20): 1641-1645. doi: 10.16073/j.cnki.cjcpt.2010.20.010

    Yao CC, Jiang J, Zhao DP, et al. Influence of order of pulmonary vessel ligation in lung carcinoma radical operation on micrometastasis[J]. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Fang Zhi Za Zhi, 2010, 17(20): 1641-1645. doi: 10.16073/j.cnki.cjcpt.2010.20.010

    [7] 张位星, 王保祥. 肺血管处理顺序对癌细胞入血的影响及临床意义[J]. 中国全科医学, 2008, 11(24): 2201-2203, 2206. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2008.24.001

    Zhang WX, Wang BX. Influence of Order of Pulmonary Vessel Ligation on Malignant Cell Dissemination[J]. Zhongguo Quan Ke Yi Xue, 2008, 11(24): 2201-2203, 2206. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2008.24.001

    [8] 艾正华, 张位星. 非小细胞肺癌患者血中pin1 mRNA的表达及肺血管处理顺序的影响[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2008, 33(12): 1132-1136. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1672-7347.2008.12.012

    Ai ZH, Zhang WX. Expression of pin1 mRNA in the circulation of non-small cell lung cancer patients and influence of sequence of vessel ligation[J]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao(Yi Xue Ban), 2008, 33(12): 1132-1136. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1672-7347.2008.12.012

    [9] 卫锐狮, 庄晓飞, 郭石平, 等. 全胸腔镜下袖式肺叶切除术治疗中央型非小细胞肺癌的回顾性队列研究[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2021, 28(6): 720-724. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXYX202106019.htm

    Wei RS, Zhuang XF, Guo SP, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy in the treatment of central non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective cohort study[J]. Zhongguo Xiong Xin Xue Guan Wai Ke Lin Chuang Za Zhi, 2021, 28(6): 720-724. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXYX202106019.htm

    [10]

    Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses[J]. Eur J Epidemiol, 2010, 25(9): 603-605. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z

    [11]

    Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials[J]. BMJ, 2011, 343: d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928

    [12]

    He HH, He JX, Hao ZX, et al. Association between different sequences of vessel ligation during video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2019, 11(3): 686-693. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.02.69

    [13]

    Kozak A, Alchimowicz J, Safranow K, et al. The impact of the sequence of pulmonary vessel ligation during anatomic resection for lung cancer on long-term survival-a prospective randomized trial[J]. Adv Med Sci, 2013, 58(1): 156-163. doi: 10.2478/v10039-012-0061-3

    [14]

    Li FW, Jiang GC, Chen YT, et al. Curative Effects of Different Sequences of Vessel Interruption During the Completely Thoracoscopic Lobectomy on Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer[J]. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2015, 21(6): 536-543. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.15-00044

    [15]

    Sumitomo R, Fukui T, Marumo S, et al. Effects of vessel interruption sequence during thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2018, 66(8): 464-470. doi: 10.1007/s11748-018-0943-9

    [16] 焦敏, 郭卉, 孙红, 等. 非小细胞肺癌患者全胸腔镜肺叶切除术血管中断顺序对预后的影响[J]. 新疆医科大学学报, 2019, 42(10): 1305-1309. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5551.2019.10.013

    Jiao M, Guo H, Sun H, et al. Effect of vascular interruption sequence on prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer in total thoracoscopic lobectomy[J]. Xinjiang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao, 2019, 42(10): 1305-1309. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5551.2019.10.013

    [17]

    Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, et al. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis[J]. Trials, 2007, 8: 16. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-8-16

    [18]

    Wei SY, Guo CL, He JT, et al. Effect of Vein-First vs Artery-First Surgical Technique on Circulating Tumor Cells and Survival in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Registry-Based Propensity Score Matching Analysis[J]. JAMA Surg, 2019, 154(7): e190972. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0972

    [19] 姜冠潮, 李凤卫, 李晓, 等. 全胸腔镜肺叶切除术中肺动、静脉切断顺序对早期非小细胞肺癌疗效的影响[J]. 中华胸心血管外科杂志, 2014, 30(9): 513-516. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-4497.2014.09.001

    Jiang GC, Li FW, Li X, et al. The study of the correlation between prognosis and the sequence of vessel interruption during thoracoscopic lobectomy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Zhonghua Xiong Xin Xue Guan Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2014, 30(9): 513-516. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-4497.2014.09.001

    [20] 白和平, 贺江, 杨三虎, 等. 全胸腔镜肺叶切除术中肺动、静脉切断顺序对早期非小细胞肺癌疗效的影响[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2016, 15(24): 2464-2466. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2016.24.028

    Bai HP, He J, Yang SH, et al. The influence of the pulmonary arteries, veins cutoff order in thoracoscope lung resection on the treatment effect of early non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Lin Chuang He Shi Yan Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2016, 15(24): 2464-2466. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2016.24.028

    [21]

    Yan TD, Black D, Bannon PG, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27(15): 2553-2562. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.2733

    [22]

    Blasberg JD, Pass HI, Donington JS. Sublobar resection: a movement from the Lung Cancer Study Group[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2010, 5(10): 1583-1593. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181e77604

    [23]

    Han D, Cao Y, Wu H, et al. Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for the treatment of lung cancer: a consensus report from Chinese Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (CSTCVS) and Chinese Association of Thoracic Surgeons (CATS)[J]. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2020, 9(4): 971-987. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-576

    [24]

    Klapper J, D'Amico TA. VATS versus open surgery for lung cancer resection: moving toward a minimally invasive approach[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2015, 13(2): 162-164. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0023

    [25]

    Kim HK. Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy[J]. J Chest Surg, 2021, 54(4): 239-245. doi: 10.5090/jcs.21.061

    [26]

    Petersen RH, Gjeraa K, Jensen K, et al. Assessment of competence in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy: A Danish nationwide study[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2018, 156(4): 1717-1722. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.04.046

    [27]

    Sesti J, Langan RC, Bell J, et al. A Comparative Analysis of Long-Term Survival of Robotic Versus Thoracoscopic Lobectomy[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2020, 110(4): 1139-1146. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.03.085

    [28]

    Huang KL, Deng HY, Fan M, et al. The sequence of pulmonary vessels ligation during lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2021, 47(7): 1535-1540. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.02.016

    [29]

    Xie S, Wu Z, Qi Y, et al. The metastasizing mechanisms of lung cancer: Recent advances and therapeutic challenges[J]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2021, 138: 111450. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111450

    [30] 孔祥楠, 张茹, 宋欣新, 等. 非小细胞肺癌患者肺静脉血循环肿瘤细胞数量及程序性死亡受体配体-1表达与预后的关系[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2021, 35(11): 1100-1103. doi: 10.13507/j.issn.1674-3474.2021.11.006

    Kong XN, Zhang R, Song XX, et al. Correlations of pulmonary venous circulating tumor cells and programmed death receptor ligand-1 with prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Zhonghua Shi Yong Zhen Duan Yu Zhi Liao Za Zhi, 2021, 35(11): 1100-1103. doi: 10.13507/j.issn.1674-3474.2021.11.006

    [31]

    Refaely Y, Sadetzki S, Chetrit A, et al. The sequence of vessel interruption during lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: is it indeed important?[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2003, 125(6): 1313-1320. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(03)00022-9

图(4)  /  表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1445
  • HTML全文浏览量:  505
  • PDF下载量:  310
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-05-30
  • 修回日期:  2022-08-28
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-01-12
  • 刊出日期:  2023-01-24

目录

/

返回文章
返回
x 关闭 永久关闭