高级搜索

腹腔镜下头尾侧联合入路治疗右半结肠癌的疗效分析

Clinical Efficacy of Laparoscopic-assisted Right Hemicolectomy with Head-tail Approach

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨头尾侧联合入路在腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术中的近期临床效果。
    方法 收集60例右半结肠癌患者临床资料,分为观察组(头尾侧联合入路)和对照组(中间入路),比较两组间手术时间、术中失血量、淋巴结数目、系膜完整性、术后疼痛VAS评分、术后第一次排气时间(d)、术后腹腔引流量、术后住院时间(d)、CEA、CA19-9(术前及术后6月)水平、术后近期并发症情况,并进行统计分析。
    结果 观察组出血量少于对照组(48.33±25.88 ml vs. 68.33±44.11 ml),获取淋巴结数目多于对照组(23.90±7.32个vs. 18.30±6.43个),系膜完整性好于对照组(1.73±0.45分vs. 1.27±0.45分)(P < 0.05)。术后住院时间、第一次排气时间、术后疼痛评分、术后腹腔引流量、CEA及CA19-9变化、近期并发症方面差异均无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。
    结论 腹腔镜右半结肠切除术采用头尾侧联合入路安全、可行。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the short-term clinical efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy with head-tail approach.
    Methods The clinical data of 60 patients with right colon cancer were retrospectively analyzed, and they were divided into observation group (head-tail approach) and control group (medial-to-lateral approach). Operation time, numbers of lymph nodes, intraoperative blood loss, mesangial integrity, postoperative pain VAS score, postoperative first exhaust time (d), intraoperative abdominal drainage, postoperative hospital stays, CEA and CA19-9 levels and postoperative complication were compared between the two groups.
    Results In observation group, intraoperative blood loss was less than the control group (48.33±25.88 ml vs. 68.33±44.11 ml), number of lymph nodes was more than the control group (23.90±7.32 vs. 18.30±6.43), mesangium integrity was better than the control group (1.73±0.45 vs. 1.27±0.45) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative hospital stays, first exhaust time, postoperative pain score, postoperative abdominal drainage, CEA and CA199 levels or short-term complications between two groups (P > 0.05).
    Conclusion Laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy is safe and feasible with a head-tail approach.

     

/

返回文章
返回