高级搜索

免疫组织化学与聚合酶链反应在结肠癌微卫星状态筛选中的比较

Assessment of Microsatallite Instability in Colorectal Carcinoma: A Comparison Between Immunohistochemistry and PCR Method

  • 摘要: 目的 比较免疫组织化学(IHC)与聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测结肠癌微卫星不稳定状态的一致性,评价IHC检测微卫星不稳定状态的可行性。方法 采用IHC和PCR两种方法分别检测80例结肠癌中微卫星不稳定状态。结果 (1)IHC法检测结果显示癌旁正常黏膜中错配修复蛋白(包括MLH1、PMS2、MSH2、MSH6)均阳性表达。四个蛋白表达缺失率分别为23.8%(19/80)、21.2%(17/80)、7.5%(6/80)、3.7%(3/80),其中有16例显示MLH1、PMS2表达同时缺失,3例显示MSH2和MSH6表达同时缺失。19例(23.8%)显示为高频微卫星不稳定,剩余病例显示微卫星稳定状态或低频微卫星不稳定;(2)PCR产物测序结果显示18例为高频微卫星不稳定,5例为低频微卫星不稳定,其余病例均为微卫星稳定状态;(3)两种方法具有高度一致性。结论 与PCR法相比,IHC具有操作简单、耗时短、费用低以及对实验仪器条件要求不高等优点,具有较高的临床应用价值,可以作为检测结肠癌微卫星不稳定状态的首选方法。

     

    Abstract: Objective To compare immunohistochemistry(IHC) with polymerase chain reaction(PCR) in evaluating the microsatallite instability(MSI) in colorectal carcinoma. Methods We used IHC and PCR to detect MSI status in 80 cases of colorectal carcinoma. Results (1) All cases exhibited mismatch repair protein(including MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6) positive expression in the matched normal mucosas. The loss expression rates of MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6 were 23.8%(19/80), 21.2%(17/80), 7.5%(6/80) and 3.7%(3/80). Both MLH1 and PMS2 expression deletion were found in 16 cases, and both MSH2 and MSH6 expression deletion were found in 3 cases. Immunohistochemisry results showed 19 cases were microsatallite instability-high(MSI-H), and the other were microsatallite instability-low/microsatallite stability(MSI-L/MSS); (2) PCR results showed there were 18 cases of MSI-H, 5 MSI-L and the remaining were MSS; (3) The results of IHC were accorded with PCR results. Conclusion Compared with PCR, IHC method is of simple operation, short cycle time, low cost and low requirement for experimental instruments. As a result, IHC is a preferred method in detecting MSI of colorectal cancer.

     

/

返回文章
返回