高级搜索

单用双极电凝断肝法与钳夹法在肝蒂横断法肝切除术中的比较

潘龙, 黄平, 杜成友, 李德卫

潘龙, 黄平, 杜成友, 李德卫. 单用双极电凝断肝法与钳夹法在肝蒂横断法肝切除术中的比较[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2015, 42(10): 1016-1019. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2015.10.014
引用本文: 潘龙, 黄平, 杜成友, 李德卫. 单用双极电凝断肝法与钳夹法在肝蒂横断法肝切除术中的比较[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2015, 42(10): 1016-1019. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2015.10.014
PAN Long, HUANG Ping, DU Chengyou, LI Dewei. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2015, 42(10): 1016-1019. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2015.10.014
Citation: PAN Long, HUANG Ping, DU Chengyou, LI Dewei. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2015, 42(10): 1016-1019. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2015.10.014

单用双极电凝断肝法与钳夹法在肝蒂横断法肝切除术中的比较

详细信息
    作者简介:

    潘龙(1986-),男,硕士,住院医师,主要从事肝脏肿瘤、胰岛移植的研究

    通讯作者:

    黄平,E-mail:huangpchina@sina.com

  • 中图分类号: R735.7

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China

  • 摘要: 目的 通过与经典的钳夹法断肝比较,探讨单用双极电凝断肝法在肝蒂横断法肝切除术中的临床价值。方法 收集101例行肝蒂横断法肝切除术的原发性肝癌患者的临床资料。依据术中离断肝实质方法的不同,分为钳夹法组及双极电凝组。对比分析两组患者临床资料的差异。结果 两组患者术前Child-Pugh分级、吲哚菁绿15 min清除率(indocyanine green clearance rate at 15min, ICGR15)、合并肝硬化情况及手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者的手术出血量[(488.89±268.76)ml vs.(390.00±209.82)ml,P=0.041)]、术中输血率(25.92% vs. 8.51%, P=0.023)、术后第一日白蛋白(albumin, ALB)水平[(25.69±4.27)ml vs.(27.57±4.11)ml, P=0.026]及术后24 h腹引量[60.00(10.00, 135.00)ml vs. 50.00(30.00, 80.00)ml P=0.039]间差异有统计学意义。结论 单独使用双极电凝断肝能够减少肝蒂横断法肝切除术出血量,降低输血率,术后白蛋白水平更高,渗出更少。单用双极电凝断肝应用于肝蒂横断法肝切除术较传统钳夹法断肝更有优势,具有临床推广价值。

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the application of bipolar coagulation in hepatectomy with Glisson's pedicle transection method by comparing the efficacy of bipolar coagulation alone and classical clump crushing technique. Methods We collected clinical data of 101 primary hepatic carcinoma patients who received hepatectomy with Glisson's pedicle transection method. According to the use of bipolar coagulation, it was differed into bipolar coagulation alone group and clamp crushing technique group. Clinical details between two groups were compared. Results The two groups were similar in Child-Pugh classification, indocyanine green clearance rate at 15minutes(ICGR15), liver sclerosis, and operation time(P>0.05). There were significance differences in bleeding amount[(488.89±268.76) vs. (390.00±209.82)ml, P=0.041], blood transfusion rate(25.92% vs. 8.51%, P=0.023), serum albumin in the first postoperative day[(25.69±4.27) vs. (27.57±4.11)ml, P=0.026] and peritoneal drainage amount in 24h after operation[60.00(10.00, 135.00) vs. 50.00(30.00, 80.00)ml P=0.039]. Conclusion Compared with classical clump crushing technique, the application of bipolar coagulation in hepatectomy with Glisson's pedicle transection method is helpful in decreasing bleeding amount and blood transfusion rate, and patients have a higher serum albumin after operation.

     

  • [1] Takasaki K. Glissonean pedicle transection method for hepatic resection: a new concept of liver segmentation[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 1998, 5(3): 286-91.
    [2] Tsuruta K, Okamoto A, Toi M, et al. Highly anatomically systematized hepatic resection with Glissonean sheath code transaction at the hepatic hilus[J]. Int Surg, 1990, 75(2): 73-7.
    [3] Feng W, Lin B, Qiu YD, et al. The clinical study of using modified Glisson pedicle transection method in the precise hepatectomy of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Zhongguo Pu Wai Ke Ji Chu Yu Lin Chuang Za Zhi, 2013, 20(7): 762-7. [冯伟, 林斌, 仇毓东,等. 改 良Glisson肝蒂法在精准肝切除术中的应用[J]. 中国普外基础 与临床杂志, 2013, 20(7): 762-7.]
    [4] Wang J, Xiao ZY, Mao K. Evaluation and selection of liver resection technology in liver surgery[J]. Zhongguo Shi Yong Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2012, 32(1): 54-6. [王捷, 肖治宇, 毛凯. 肝脏手术 中断肝技术的合理选择及评价[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2012, 32 (1): 54-6.]
    [5] Guo JY, Li DW, Liao R, et al. Outcomes of simple salinecoupled bipolar electrocautery for hepatic resection[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(26): 8638-45.
    [6] Perini MV, Starkey G, Fink MA, et al. From minimal to maximal surgery in the treatment of hepatocarcinoma: A review[J]. World J Hepatol, 2015, 7(1): 93-100.
    [7] Dong JH, Huang ZQ. Precise liver resection- new concept of liver surgery in 21st century[J]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2009, 47 (21): 1601-5. [董家鸿, 黄志强. 精准肝切除——21世纪肝脏 外科新理念[J]. 中华外科杂志,2009, 47(21): 1601-5.]
    [8] Yamamoto M, Katagiri S, Ariizumi S, et al. Glissonean pedicle transection method for liver surgery (with video)[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2012, 19(1): 3-8.
    [9] Karamarkovi? A, Doklesti? K, Popovi? N, et al. Suprahilar vascular control and stapling device transection of Glissonian pedicle in major and minor hepatectomies[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2013, 60 (128): 2060-8.
    [10] Ji B, Wang YC, Wang GY, et al. Curative resection of hepatocellualr carcinoma using modified glissonean pedicle transection versus the pringle maneuver: A case control study[J]. Int J Med Sci, 2012, 9(10): 843-52.
    [11] Luo ZQ, Shao JH, Wu LC, et al. Application of Glissonean pedicle transection method for hepatic segmentectomy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis of 15 cases[J]. Zhongguo Shi Yong Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2011, 31(6): 506-7. [罗志强, 邵江华, 邬林泉, 等. Glisson蒂横断式肝段切除术治疗肝癌15 例分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2011, 31(6): 506-7.]
    [12] Scalzone R, Lopez-Ben S, Figueras J. How to transect the liver? A history lasting more than a century[J]. Dig Surg, 2012, 29: 30-4.
    [13] Alexiou VG, Tsitsias T, Mavros MN, et al. Technology-assisted versus clamp-crush liver resection: a systematic review and Metaanalysis[ J] Surg Innov, 2013, 20(4): 414-28.
    [14] Mei J, Zhang GH, Chu H, et al. Application of bipolar coagulator in general surgery[J]. Fu Bu Wai Ke, 2002, 15(2): 118-9. [梅杰,张 光辉, 褚皓, 等.双极电凝器在普外科手术中的应用[J]. 腹部外 科, 2002, 15(2): 118-9.]
    [15] Karaman Y, Bingol B, Günenç Z. Prevention of complications in laparoscopic hysterectomy: experience with 1120 cases performed by a single surgeon[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2007, 14(1): 78 -84.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1615
  • HTML全文浏览量:  356
  • PDF下载量:  537
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-05-19
  • 修回日期:  2015-08-18
  • 刊出日期:  2015-10-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    x 关闭 永久关闭