高级搜索

MRI成像对鼻咽癌的分期、诊断及治疗优势的探讨

龚唯, 周菊英, 吴琼, 赵奇, 陈龙, 郭建

龚唯, 周菊英, 吴琼, 赵奇, 陈龙, 郭建. MRI成像对鼻咽癌的分期、诊断及治疗优势的探讨[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2012, 39(04): 455-459. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2012.04.023
引用本文: 龚唯, 周菊英, 吴琼, 赵奇, 陈龙, 郭建. MRI成像对鼻咽癌的分期、诊断及治疗优势的探讨[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2012, 39(04): 455-459. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2012.04.023
Gong Wei, Zhou Juying, Wu Qiong, Zhao Qi, Chen Long, Guo Jian. Investigation of MRI Imaging in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Staging,Diagnosis and Treatment Advantages[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2012, 39(04): 455-459. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2012.04.023
Citation: Gong Wei, Zhou Juying, Wu Qiong, Zhao Qi, Chen Long, Guo Jian. Investigation of MRI Imaging in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Staging,Diagnosis and Treatment Advantages[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2012, 39(04): 455-459. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2012.04.023

MRI成像对鼻咽癌的分期、诊断及治疗优势的探讨

详细信息
    作者简介:

    龚唯(1980-),女,硕士在读,主要从事肿瘤及正常组织放射效应的研究工作

    通讯作者:

    周菊英,E-mail:zhjuying@sohu.com

  • 中图分类号: R739.63

Investigation of MRI Imaging in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Staging,Diagnosis and Treatment Advantages

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨鼻咽癌1992年福州分期和2008年分期差异、CT和MRI对鼻咽癌病变的检出率和原发肿瘤靶区(GTV)勾画和体积计算的影响。方法 收集89例初治鼻咽癌患者的CT和MRI图像,分别按1992年福州分期和2008年分期标准进行,比较两种检查手段对各解剖部位的检出差异,挑选出CT与MRI检出有差异的39例,在TPS下进行GTV勾画及体积计算。结果 MRI在1992年福州分期中的参与使早期(T1+T2)构成比降低,晚期(T3+T4)构成比升高。鼻咽癌2008年分期使T3 、T4期患者增多。两种分期标准对T2、T3分期差异有统计学意义(P=0.033,0.008);在N1、N2的判断中,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。MRI较CT对头长肌、咽旁间隙、海绵窦、副鼻窦及颅神经的检出率明显提高;在对咽后淋巴结及颈部肿大淋巴结的形态、包膜、坏死、融合的显示方面明显优于CT。对39例CT和MRI成像有差异的病例进行靶区勾画,结果显示GTVMRI>GTVCT。结论 根据MRI图像进行1992年福州分期发现了更多的晚期病例,需要进行综合治疗(放疗+化疗)的患者增多,为治疗方案的选择提供了重要参考。以MRI为基础的2008年分期是指导鼻咽癌治疗的主要标准。按照MRI图像进行肿瘤靶区勾画能有效避免CT图像对肿瘤组织的漏诊以及对正常组织的误诊,既能加强局部控制,又能保护正常组织,对于鼻咽癌患者的治疗有利无弊。

     

    Abstract: Objective To explore the differences between 1992 Fuzhou staging and 2008 staging system,between computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)scans of the lesion detection,the impaction to primary tumor volume of nasopharyngeal carcinoma(GTV) and volume calculation. Methods Eighty-nine nasopharyngeal carcinoma cases with new-treated CT and MRI images were collected,staging the T,N stage respectively in 1992 Fuzhou and 2008 staging system,comparing the differences between the two means of checking the detection.Thirty-nine cases with differences between CT and MRI imaging were selected to draw the target volume of primary tumor and calculate the volume under the treatment plan system(TPS). Results Because MRI images in 1992 Fuzhou staging,the composition of early(T1+T2) was lower than the increased ratio of late(T3+T4).The 2008 staging increased T3,T4 patients.In T2 and T3 stage division,the two phases have significant difference (P=0.033,0.008),the difference of N1,N2 was statistically significant(P<0.05).MRI was better than CT in detecting the invasion of NPC in head long muscle,parapharyngeal space,cavernous sinus,paranasal sinuses and cranial nerves.In displaying lymph nodes in retropharyngeal,the neck shape,capsule,necrosis and fusion,MRI was superior to CT.For target of the 39 cases of CT and MRI images outlined,the results showed GTVMRI>GTVCT. Conclusion According to MRI images of 1992 Fuzhou staging,we find more advanced cases,the need for comprehensive treatment(radiotherapy+chemotherapy)patients has increased,the choice of treatment provides an important reference.With MRI-based 2008 stage system is the main criterion guiding the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.MRI images of images can effectively avoid the misdiagnosis of the tumor tissue and normal tissue,both enhancing local control and protecting normal tissue,the nose pharyngeal cancer patients will be treated advantageously.

     

  • [1] China Clinical Stages of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Working Committee.′92 staging ofnasopharyngeal carcinoma revision work report[J].Zhonghua Fang She Zhong Liu Xue Za Zhi,2009,18(1):2-6.[中国鼻咽癌临床分期工作委员会.鼻咽癌′92分期修订工作报告[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2009,18(1):2-6.]
    [2] Zhong PL,Wang RS,Wei B,et al.The value of CT and MRI in staging system of nasopharyngealcarcinoma [J].Zhong Liu Yu Fang Yu Zhi Liao,2009,22(1):34-38.[钟沛霖,王仁生,韦波,等.CT与MRI在鼻咽癌不同分期系统中的应用[J].肿瘤预防与治疗,2009,22(1):34-38.]
    [3] Han J,Shen WR,He X,et al.A comparision of CT and MRI in the diagnosis for nasopharyngealcarcinoma [J].Zhong Liu Xue Za Zhi,2006,12(4):279-281.[韩晶,沈文荣,何侠,等.鼻咽癌的CT与MRI对比分析[J].肿瘤学杂志,2006,12(4):279-281.]
    [4] King AD,Bhatia KS.Magnetic resonance imaging staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the headand neck [J].World J Radiol,2010,2(5):159-165.
    [5] Hu D,Cao KJ,Xie GF,et al.Correlation of Imaging-based Staging to Prognosis of NasopharyngealCarcinoma:Computed Tomography Magnetic Resonance Imaging[J].Ai Zheng:Ying Wen Ban(Englishedition),2008,27(7):738-742.[胡丹,曹卡加,谢国丰,等,鼻咽癌放疗前CT或MRI检查分期与预后关系的比较[J].癌症:英文版,2008,27(2):738-742.]
    [6] Lee AW,Sze WM,Au JS,et al.Treatment results for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the modern era:the Hong Kong experience[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2005,61(4):1107-1116.
    [7] Lee CC,Ho HC,Lee MS,et al.Primary tumor volume of nasopharyngeal carcinoma:Significance forsurvival [J].Auris Nasus Larynx,2008,35(3):376-380.
    [8] Emami B,Sethi A,Petruzzelli GJ.Influence of MRI on target volume delineation and MRI planningin nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J],Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2003,57(2):481-488.
    [9] Li L,Wang AY,Zhu XD,et al.Study of effects of difference between MRI and CT findings on T-staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and target volume[J].Lin Chuang Fang She Xue Za Zhi,2008,27(5):593-596.[李龄,王安宇,朱小东,等.MRI与CT成像差异对鼻咽癌T分期以及原发肿瘤靶区体积影响的研究[J].临床放射学杂志,2008,27(5):593-596.]
    [10] Jonsson JH,Karlsson MG,Karlsson M,et al.Treatment planning using MRI data:an analysis ofthe dose calculation accuracy for different treatment regions[J].Radiat Oncol,2010,5:62.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2666
  • HTML全文浏览量:  22
  • PDF下载量:  702
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2011-11-07
  • 修回日期:  2012-02-14
  • 刊出日期:  2012-04-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    x 关闭 永久关闭