高级搜索

新辅助化疗对129 例Ⅲ期低位直肠癌TME 术后影响的生存分析

肖 红, 张建勇, 段永亮, 潘金强

肖 红, 张建勇, 段永亮, 潘金强. 新辅助化疗对129 例Ⅲ期低位直肠癌TME 术后影响的生存分析[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2008, 35(11): 819-822. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.1939
引用本文: 肖 红, 张建勇, 段永亮, 潘金强. 新辅助化疗对129 例Ⅲ期低位直肠癌TME 术后影响的生存分析[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2008, 35(11): 819-822. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.1939
XIAO Hong, ZHAN GJ ianyong, DUAN Yongliang, PAN J inqiang. Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Low2set Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Total Mesorectal Excision —Survival Analysis of 129 Cases[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2008, 35(11): 819-822. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.1939
Citation: XIAO Hong, ZHAN GJ ianyong, DUAN Yongliang, PAN J inqiang. Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Low2set Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Total Mesorectal Excision —Survival Analysis of 129 Cases[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2008, 35(11): 819-822. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.1939

新辅助化疗对129 例Ⅲ期低位直肠癌TME 术后影响的生存分析

详细信息
  • 中图分类号: R735. 3

Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Low2set Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Total Mesorectal Excision —Survival Analysis of 129 Cases

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨术前新辅助化疗对低位直肠癌生存率的影响,评价其安全性及可行性。方法 回顾性分析我院2002 年1 月~2006 年12 月外科完全性切除低位直肠癌129 例临床资料,分为新辅助化疗+ 手术组(B 组) 与直接手术组(A 组), Life2table 法比较两组1 、3 、5 年生存率差异, Kaplan2Meier 法比较两组累计生存率及中位生存时间,并分析全组患者因肿瘤分期、病理类型及淋巴结转移状况不同所致的生存差异(α= 0. 05) ;结果 两组低位直肠癌患者术后1 、3 、5 年生存率分别为A 组:90 %、81 %、33 %;B 组:93 %、84 %、42 %, 两组术后平均生存时间分别为39. 5和46. 1月,中位生存期分别为41. 4和47. 2月,差异有统计学意义( P < 0. 05) 。结论 在可手术治疗的低位直肠癌中新辅助化疗+ 手术对生存期的影响较直接手术有优势,新辅助化疗并未增加手术难度,是安全可行的。

     

    Abstract: Objective  To explore the safety and feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on low2set rectal cancer patient s in stage Ⅲreceiving total mesorectal excision. Methods  One hundred and twenty2nine ca2 ses of low2set rectal cancer patient s in stage Ⅲt reated with total mesorectal excision ( TME) f rom J anuary 2002 to December 2006 in Xinjiang Traditional Chinese medicine Hospital which were reviewed ret rospec2 tively. According to the cure method, the patient s were divided into group A (65 cases, cont rol group without neoadjuvant chemotherapy) and group B ( 64 cases, preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy group) . Life2table law compares the difference of survival rate of 1, 3, 5 years of two group s, Kaplan2 Meier law compares the cumulate survival time, mean and medians time between two groups (α= 0. 05) . Results  The 1 、3 、5 survival rate of post2operation was 90 %、81 %、33 % in A group ; 93 %、84 %、42 % in B group respectively. The average survival time of the two group s is 39. 5 (A group), 46. 1 (B group ) months respectively ;and the median survival time of the two group s was 41. 4, 47. 2 months respectively. There was significant difference between them( P < 0. 05) . Conclusion  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery has ascendancy compared with Operation directly as influenced on the survival time in resectable low2set rectal cancer patient s in stage Ⅲ, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy dose not increase the difficulty of operation in some degree, and it is still safe and feasible in patient s with low2set rectal cancer patient s in stage Ⅲ.

     

计量
  • 文章访问数:  2199
  • HTML全文浏览量:  14
  • PDF下载量:  529
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2007-12-12
  • 修回日期:  2008-05-29
  • 刊出日期:  2008-11-04

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    x 关闭 永久关闭